http://elpais.com
sociedad, nuclear
イギリス政府は、新しく8つの原子力(核)発電所の建設を予定しているが、企業は、巨大な建設費と長期に渡る投資回復に難色を示す(尻込み)
El plan nuclear británico choca con las reclamaciones de las eléctricas
Las empresas piden más garantías públicas para construir las ocho centrales que impulsa Londres
Iberdrola decidirá en 2015 si lleva a cabo la inversión
The British nuclear plan clashes with the claims of the electrical
The companies want more government guarantees to build the eight central London driving
Iberdrola will decide in 2015 whether to conduct investment
Rafael Mendez Madrid 21 MAY 2012 - 02:51 CET
The companies want more government guarantees to build the eight central London driving
Iberdrola will decide in 2015 whether to conduct investment
Rafael Mendez Madrid 21 MAY 2012 - 02:51 CET
The UK will be, along with France, a good yardstick for the future of nuclear energy in developed countries. London has in place a plan to build eight nuclear power stations a decade to replace the current ones. The problem is that utilities must build beginning to show doubts. The German E.ON and RWE withdrew, Centrica and GDF Suez have called for more government guarantees and EDF is behind schedule in your project. Iberdrola just silent. The electric press for better security at a time to obtain credit to invest billions in huge works is more difficult to merge the atom.
The UK has 16 reactors that produce 15% of electricity. London says that without new nuclear power in 2023 only have a nuclear reactor running. While countries like the United States have chosen to extend the life of their nuclear to 60 years, United Kingdom does not have that possibility. Reactors are of a proprietary technology (the AGR) and the sector relies on long-term operation. To replace them, the British government promoted the construction of 16,000 megawatts of new nuclear power (over twice that found in Spain) before 2025, which would create 30,000 jobs in that time.
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Energy and Climate of the British Government / COUNTRYFrance's EDF, along with Britain's Centrica, plans to build four reactors of new design, the EPR, which would add 6,400 megawatts. Nugen, a consortium 50% owned by France's GDF and Iberdrola Spanish, wants to build 3,600 megawatts in Moorside (northwest). The third group consisted E.On and RWE, 6,000 megawatts were to raise your company Horizon. But last March 29 announced its withdrawal from the plan and its intention to sell Horizon, which had already acquired land and had advanced the project.
On Tuesday, the companies explained in the British Parliament that the investment, a reactor may be around 5,000 million euros, would have led the company to downgrade agency said Volker Beckers, CEO of RWE, as reported The Guardian newspaper. Tony Cocker, head of E.ON UK, said: "Nuclear energy is a very long term investment." Now seeking buyer for Horizon.
No new plants have a UK single reactor in 2023
The Achilles heel of this energy is precisely the enormous investment required and the long period of repayment, at a time of tight credit and rising costs, among other things, the impact of Fukushima. A nuclear industry source who asked not to be identified said: "E.ON and RWE are removed by their problems in Germany and the rest takes to press. The British announced a very liberal, without public aid, and crowded business because they want some kind of security "that they will recover their investment.
The problem is recurrent. U.S. has authorized the construction of four nuclear reactors, but in southern states with regulated markets. That means that the nuclear price are guaranteed to be charged by electricity. The emergence of cheap natural gas extracted by the new technique of hydraulic fracturing has come to change the energy landscape.
At the stroke of RWE and E.On followed by others. Gerard Mestrallet, chairman of France's GDF, said shortly afterwards: "Together with our partners will make a decision in 2015. Today it is very difficult to invest in nuclear energy "without a clear return. Mestrallet said that the proposed London to tax CO2 does not seem sufficient to warrant the investment.
E.On and RWE have resigned despite having already purchased
land
The only power that keeps silence is Iberdrola. "We maintain the same posture. Everything continues as planned. Make a decision in 2015, "explains a spokesman.
Marcel Coderch, antinuclear and coauthor of The Nuclear Mirage, betting that the plan is to deflate: "Margaret Thatcher and wanted to build 10 or 12 nuclear and only managed to lift one. No wonder they would repeat the experience. " The key now is what to do EDF, the French state-controlled and operated by the British nuclear fleet. "Those who have to move part is EDF, which may pressure the British government," adds Coderch.
Corporations are demanding a fixed price for that, although long-term electricity down, they paid the same. That said Coderch interest to those who believe that electricity will eventually fall. Another of their demands is to set a high price for CO2, which would make them less competitive coal plants and gas.
Giants such as China have nuclear programs, but the situation (growth, market or cost) is not comparable with that of Western countries, where there are few new projects are facing delays and cost overruns (as in Finland and France). The guarantees offered by UK finally for new nuclear will be reviewed throughout the world. Among other things, because nuclear has often been defended by liberals who criticized the renewable premiums for distorting the market.
Hollande Earrings
Environmentalists had high hopes for François Hollande. At the beginning of the campaign, and as a concession to the Greens, even announced its intention to lower the percentage of nuclear electricity in France from 75% today to 50% in 2030.Sin But as the campaign progressed was moderating its message and the poor performance of the Greens eventually bury the speech. In the election debate with Sarkozy made clear that only close the country's oldest nuclear (both reactors Fessenheim) at the end of the mandate and justified that it was good for France was also leader in nuclear decommissioning. Furthermore, continued to support the new French reactor, the EPR. A nuclear spin in France would be an earthquake in the sector, EDF and Areva-state enterprises exported reactors (at least try to).
The French nuclear industry believes it will Hollande as Zapatero, ie little or nothing. The former Spanish arrived announcing a timetable for nuclear shutdown and concluded leaving tray extension of Garoña Rajoy.
The UK has 16 reactors that produce 15% of electricity. London says that without new nuclear power in 2023 only have a nuclear reactor running. While countries like the United States have chosen to extend the life of their nuclear to 60 years, United Kingdom does not have that possibility. Reactors are of a proprietary technology (the AGR) and the sector relies on long-term operation. To replace them, the British government promoted the construction of 16,000 megawatts of new nuclear power (over twice that found in Spain) before 2025, which would create 30,000 jobs in that time.
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Energy and Climate of the British Government / COUNTRYFrance's EDF, along with Britain's Centrica, plans to build four reactors of new design, the EPR, which would add 6,400 megawatts. Nugen, a consortium 50% owned by France's GDF and Iberdrola Spanish, wants to build 3,600 megawatts in Moorside (northwest). The third group consisted E.On and RWE, 6,000 megawatts were to raise your company Horizon. But last March 29 announced its withdrawal from the plan and its intention to sell Horizon, which had already acquired land and had advanced the project.
On Tuesday, the companies explained in the British Parliament that the investment, a reactor may be around 5,000 million euros, would have led the company to downgrade agency said Volker Beckers, CEO of RWE, as reported The Guardian newspaper. Tony Cocker, head of E.ON UK, said: "Nuclear energy is a very long term investment." Now seeking buyer for Horizon.
No new plants have a UK single reactor in 2023
The Achilles heel of this energy is precisely the enormous investment required and the long period of repayment, at a time of tight credit and rising costs, among other things, the impact of Fukushima. A nuclear industry source who asked not to be identified said: "E.ON and RWE are removed by their problems in Germany and the rest takes to press. The British announced a very liberal, without public aid, and crowded business because they want some kind of security "that they will recover their investment.
The problem is recurrent. U.S. has authorized the construction of four nuclear reactors, but in southern states with regulated markets. That means that the nuclear price are guaranteed to be charged by electricity. The emergence of cheap natural gas extracted by the new technique of hydraulic fracturing has come to change the energy landscape.
At the stroke of RWE and E.On followed by others. Gerard Mestrallet, chairman of France's GDF, said shortly afterwards: "Together with our partners will make a decision in 2015. Today it is very difficult to invest in nuclear energy "without a clear return. Mestrallet said that the proposed London to tax CO2 does not seem sufficient to warrant the investment.
E.On and RWE have resigned despite having already purchased
land
The only power that keeps silence is Iberdrola. "We maintain the same posture. Everything continues as planned. Make a decision in 2015, "explains a spokesman.
Marcel Coderch, antinuclear and coauthor of The Nuclear Mirage, betting that the plan is to deflate: "Margaret Thatcher and wanted to build 10 or 12 nuclear and only managed to lift one. No wonder they would repeat the experience. " The key now is what to do EDF, the French state-controlled and operated by the British nuclear fleet. "Those who have to move part is EDF, which may pressure the British government," adds Coderch.
Corporations are demanding a fixed price for that, although long-term electricity down, they paid the same. That said Coderch interest to those who believe that electricity will eventually fall. Another of their demands is to set a high price for CO2, which would make them less competitive coal plants and gas.
Giants such as China have nuclear programs, but the situation (growth, market or cost) is not comparable with that of Western countries, where there are few new projects are facing delays and cost overruns (as in Finland and France). The guarantees offered by UK finally for new nuclear will be reviewed throughout the world. Among other things, because nuclear has often been defended by liberals who criticized the renewable premiums for distorting the market.
Hollande Earrings
Environmentalists had high hopes for François Hollande. At the beginning of the campaign, and as a concession to the Greens, even announced its intention to lower the percentage of nuclear electricity in France from 75% today to 50% in 2030.Sin But as the campaign progressed was moderating its message and the poor performance of the Greens eventually bury the speech. In the election debate with Sarkozy made clear that only close the country's oldest nuclear (both reactors Fessenheim) at the end of the mandate and justified that it was good for France was also leader in nuclear decommissioning. Furthermore, continued to support the new French reactor, the EPR. A nuclear spin in France would be an earthquake in the sector, EDF and Areva-state enterprises exported reactors (at least try to).
The French nuclear industry believes it will Hollande as Zapatero, ie little or nothing. The former Spanish arrived announcing a timetable for nuclear shutdown and concluded leaving tray extension of Garoña Rajoy.
イギリス政府は、新しく8つの原子力(核)発電所の建設を予定しているが、企業は、巨大な建設費と長期に渡る投資回復に難色を示す(尻込み)
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿