スペイン政府の改正住宅ローン法は、条件が厳しく、住宅ローン未払いによる差し押え·立ち退きの執行の停止には、不十分で、無効果。消費者の権利保護には程遠い。
ANÁLISIS
Vulnerables y vulnerados
La nueva ley da la espalda al debate social
Llega a la tramitación sin haber medido antes el impacto del decreto al que va a dar continuidad
Violeta Assiego Cruz 27 ABR 2013 - 21:16 CET
ANALYSIS
Vulnerable and violated
The new law gives back to the social debate
Get to the processing without having measured before the impact of the decree which will give continuity
Assiego Violeta Cruz 27 ABR 2013 - 21:16 CET
The bill that the Senate has yet to approve, and whose measures is to strengthen the protection of the mortgagor, is insufficient and inefficient. This is the main conclusion that can be drawn from this research.
The first chapter of the future law decal content, and spirit, of Royal Decree Law 27/2012, when, in light of the study conducted, it appears that no more than 2% of the mortgage proceedings initiated in the years 2010 and 2011 have benefited from the measure contained in this statement. This, and other data collected in research corroborate that the new law gives back to the social debate and come to parliamentary procedure without previously measured the true impact of the royal decree is to provide continuity.
The move to suspend evictions for two years sought to ensure, so stated in the preamble to the Royal Decree that no citizen was led to a situation of social exclusion. However, the analysis of court records reveals debtors whose personal and financial situation is extremely fragile and that, however, are outside the scope of the Royal Decree by not fulfilling the four economic requirements, or living alone, or not having a family model that meets the letter of the rule, or that, having that kind of family unit, their vulnerability does not correspond to any of those referred to in the statute.
These debtors indebted as a result of unemployment and crisis are not vulnerable in the terms established by the Royal Decree, although its current proprietary capacity is clearly insufficient to meet their basic daily expenses and.
After learning the latest data from the EPA fits rather conclude that the mere fact of being unemployed and having signed a residence mortgage loan should be sufficient cause for special treatment initiated prior to the eviction process. In the current context, this seems to be the most vulnerable situation that could lead to aggravate and worsen the risk of social exclusion of a citizen.
Violet is a lawyer and coordinates Assiego studies Discrimination, Poverty and Social Exclusion in Metroscopia. On twitter @ Vissibles
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿