スペインの専門家による破綻しないための年金制度改革案は、合意に逹せず、時間かせぎ
Los expertos se dan una prórroga por la falta de consenso sobre las pensiones
El documento que encargó el Gobierno a 12 entendidos tiene que estar listo esta semana
Manuel V. Gómez Madrid 28 MAY 2013 - 00:01 CET
El grupo de 12 expertos designados por el Gobierno, junto a los responsables del Ministerio de Empleo el día que se constituyó la comisión, el pasado 25 de abril. Desde la izquierda: José Luis Tortuero, Miguel Ángel García, José Ignacio Conde-Ruiz, Mercedes Ayuso, Miguel Ángel Vázquez, Francisco Castellano, Manuel Lagares, Tomás Burgos (secretario de Estado de la Seguridad Social), Fátima Báñez (ministra de Empleo y Seguridad Social), Víctor Pérez Díaz (presidente del comité), José Enrique Devesa, José María Marín, Rafael Doménech y Santos Ruesga. / chema moya (efe)
The experts are given an extension by the lack of consensus on pensions
The document commissioned by the Government to 12 connoisseurs have to be ready this week
Manuel V. Gomez Madrid 28 MAY 2013 - 00:01 CET
The work of experts that the Government commissioned a report on the upcoming pension reform is in serious risk of ending up without consensus. Yesterday marked day for the last meeting, it was not possible to achieve, so I decided to take more time. The meeting concluded with the cards face up. A large majority was decanted to propose to the Government a sustainability factor, the objective of the reform-formula containing a double savings in pension expenditure: one for calculating the amount of new pensions taking into account life expectancy and another to link the annual update to the health benefits of the Social Security accounts detaching it from the march of prices. But there is a minority who do not share this approach, suggest several sources, and yesterday was not possible to bring positions.
moreSo new pensions will be calculatedExperts back that lost purchasing power of pensionsExperts are opting to start the 2014 pension adjustmentDouble pension adjustment
The differences between them even start point of the work. For most-nine of the 12 members of the group, which takes the report "provisional" prepared by the Presidency on yesterday revolved around discussions, the pension system "has secured the balance 'and faces serious problems (demographic and economic). Disagree on this point, the position of Santos Ruesga, Professor of Applied Economics by the PSOE proposed to form part of the Committee, who argues that "no immediate need" of this reform, since you first have to see how it is working the approved 2011, which provides for delaying the retirement age gradually to 67 years until 2027.
The position of the supported Ruesga José Luis Tortuero yesterday, Professor of Labour Law and Social Security, also proposed by the PSOE. Tortuero arguments, and also those of Ruesga, lament the lack of time they have had to prepare the report. The third dissenting vote is to Miguel Angel Garcia, director of the research bureau of CCOO, say several sources. Although their arguments not revealed.
Unable to agree on a document and after a longer meeting than usual, experts agreed to meet again this week, without specifying when. Although the deadline given by the executive just this week.
Two members do not see an urgent need for changes
In principle, the meeting yesterday was to be the last. It had to leave the final conclusions of the document to be submitted to the Executive. Closed this phase, the Ministry of Employment is committed to send the report to the Toledo Pact, the committee which negotiated pension reforms, and social partners to initiate conversations.
The existence of conflicting positions was something that was a month ago. Some were betting on a system similar to Swedish (all quoted in a piggy bank accumulates fictional), which would be a radical change from the current system. Others, however, saw you first have to analyze the consequences of the reform that has begun to be implemented this year, although it was approved in 2011. The shock was logical given the composition of the commission. Faced with the origin of the three already mentioned, is Miguel Angel Vazquez, chief of Unespa studies, employers insurers, and two regular contributors to this organization: Sociology Professor Victor Perez Diaz and Rafael Domenech, the service BBVA research. Joining them are located economics professor Jose Ignacio Conde-Ruiz, a member of an advisory group of insurer Aviva, and Manuel Lagares, Mapfre counselor.
"It is right that applies to all retirees," says the draft text
One of the dissenting arguments is that by proposing a two-way savings in the system, the group exceeds the mandate given law. They argue the decree of appointment and the reform of 2011, which opens the door to sustainability factor provide that this factor has to consist of a formula to modify the parameters of the system according to life expectancy. Instead, the report making its way there yesterday between most two ways: the law two years ago and a new update which would link the pension income and Social Security outlays, and would also affect current retirees. However, the interim report notes that "for reasons of justice and prudence sustainability factor should be applied to current and future retirees in degrees and under different forms."
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿