スペイン経済大臣 Luis de GuindosとBanco Santander 頭取 Emilio Botin, BBVA 頭取Francisco Gonzalez, Caixa Bank,とうどりIsidro Faire の5月4日、6日の会合の目的は、Bankia 銀行についてで、Bankia銀行頭取のRodrigo Ratoの銀行再編金は70億0000ユーロですむとの意見には同意できず、最低150億0000'0000ユーロ ー 200億0000'0000ユーロ必要と意見、Rodrigo Ratoの楽観的すぎる銀行の将来の予想
Botín y González no creyeron las cifras de Rato ni la viabilidad de Bankia
El presidente del Santander y el del BBVA afirman que las reuniones con Guindos en mayo se centraron en la grave situación de Bankia y la necesidad de inyectar el doble de capital
La versión que han ofrecido los banqueros no coincide con la proporcionada por Guindos
Íñigo de Barrón Madrid 24 MAY 2013 - 13:11 CET
Booty and disbelieved González Rato figures or the viability of Bankia
The chairman of Santander and BBVA claim that meetings with Guindos in May focused on the plight of Bankia and the need to inject capital twice
The version that bankers have offered does not match that provided by Guindos
Barron Inigo Madrid 24 MAY 2013 - 13:11 CET
The chairmen of Banco Santander, Emilio Botin, Caixa Bank, Isidro Faine, and BBVA, Francisco González, said Friday before the National Court Judge Fernando Andreu to explain the purpose of the meetings held with the Minister of Economy and Competitiveness, Luis de Guindos, 4 and May 6, days before the resignation of Rodrigo Rato as chairman of Bankia.
The three executives have agreed that the main theme of the meeting was the future of Bankia, which was "an elephant in a room", which is the reference that Gonzalez used to define the magnitude of such an entity in the financial system . All agreed that the situation needed a strong response. Shortly after these meetings, Bankia received 22.424 million from the state to be nationalized. Guindos simplified the theme of this meeting in his statement to the judge and said he met with bankers on a "regular contact he had with the heads of major financial institutions to analyze the situation of the financial system and the euro zone crisis" .
Isidro Faine, Chairman of CaixaBank. / SAMUEL SANCHEZ
However, Gonzalez and Booty no secret that the main issue was a big debate on Bankia and lack of credibility that they gave the figures presented by the President Rodrigo Rato for his turnaround, they said the lawyers present in the case. While responsible for Bankia said that with 7,000 million was enough, competitors claimed more than doubled and the nationalization of the company.
Faine, however, hinted that Bankia considered possible refloat the 7,000 million need Rato said. However, he added that international markets did not believe that this figure was enough. Another controversial issues were the supposed benefits of Bankia, which initially amounted to 300 million. Booty would not go to value Bankia accounts "because they are internal issues", although an injection called "very fast 15,000 million, a massive aid", which involved nationalization. Gonzalez went further and stated that Bankia needed between 15,000 and 20,000 million, "said the reports as investment banks" and that valuations de Rato "were not credible" for being "too optimistic".
Accounting "gum"
BBVA president also said, according to Andres Herzog, UPyD lawyer, although accounting "is like gum" with the ability to vary depending on the items that are taken into account, Rato had made profits. He also noted that "since October," it was known that Bankia situation was weak. Asked why he thought Rato refused to accept a need as high of money, Gonzalez said that because his figures, he could continue in office and not nationalization.
moreGuindos says not reject any plan RatoAnticorruption opens preferred actions by BankiaGoirigolzarri: "I sorprendión that offered me the presidency Rato"The long agony of Bankia
For 15MpaRato lawyer Juan Ignacio Moreno, these testimonies corroborate the irregular accounts of Bankia, which is a deception for preferentistas, who could not know the real situation of the entity and, therefore, sell their products before nationalization. They also claim to increase the bond sought to deal with the 956 preferentistas present in the case.
González also criticized the Government to explain that they were living a complicated situation with Bankia in May "because he had not saved any problems early, ie, between February and April," said Herzog. None of the squad seemed strange that this meeting not called the Bank of Spain. Economy Faine also said it was "competent" to address these issues.
Resignation of Rato
The three presidents agreed that the meeting did not discuss the resignation of Rato. Booty hinted that did not seem the place and the right time because it was present chairman of Bankia. Nor Rato told them that it would leave Bankia, at any time, Booty said. According to the lawyers present in the case, the chief executive of Santander said that when finished the second meeting, on Sunday May 6 last night, did not have the impression that Rato would resign or that he was to be changes in the management team.
The early riser and the first to go before the magistrate was Booty, who arrived a few minutes of 0900, with one hour ahead of schedule. His appearance lasted less than half an hour and, after her, has merely stated: "Everything went well and looks nice." Santander president has been very quiet and has greeted the people gathered at the gates of the Hearing. Behind him entered Faine, which has been followed by Gonzalez. CaixaBank's president, who has been 25 minutes before the judge, has left the hearing without making any statements. 12.00 Before they had finished all appearances.
Outside of the courts were stationed numerous journalists and affected by the preferred. The latter against Santander carried signs with slogans of "Santander robs us and we drown" and the more traditional anti Bankia in them was one that could read: "We will not be shareholders of Bankia" with respect to the exchange shares.
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿