http://elpais.com
スペインでは、住宅市場の下落により、ある地方では、低所得者住宅は、中古住宅より高くなる
La vivienda social ya es más cara que la usada en 11 provincias
El desajuste se debe al desplome de los precios en el mercado libre
La brecha llega a ser del 30% en Teruel
Lluís Pellicer Barcelona2 JUL 2012 - 00:15 CET
Social housing is now more expensive than that used in 11 provinces
The mismatch is due to the collapse of free market prices
The gap becomes 30% Teruel
Pellicer Barcelona Lluís 2 JUL 2012 - 00:15 CET
The mismatch is due to the collapse of free market prices
The gap becomes 30% Teruel
Pellicer Barcelona Lluís 2 JUL 2012 - 00:15 CET
The real estate collapse has upended housing policies. So much so that in many areas of Spain the social prices of the apartments have already been phased out. In 11 provinces and sheltered housing are more expensive than second hand free, with a price difference reaches 30% in the case of Teruel. If the calculation is done by communities, six of them the gap between what it costs to buy a used home and public housing has closed to be less than 10%, whereas before the crisis in these autonomies that difference was about 30%. The gap in prices is due both to the collapse of the price of private housing as protected market rigidities.
Housing policy in Spain has traditionally been based on building affordable homes, especially property, for citizens who were outside the free market. At that time, many developers rejected the construction of floors protected because they got it to account, given the huge price difference with the market: according to the Ministry of Development, in 2007 social homes that cost half free. So the main concern of the authorities was to raise the maximum price allowed for public flats to attract private developers in this market. But that strategy did away with the bursting of the bubble.
Since prices reached highs in late 2008 before starting to deflate the value of private housing has fallen by 18.3%, while that of the protected only it has 1.7%. That closed the gap between private housing and protected. In five provinces, all the free-market homes both new and used, and are more expensive than social, but the difference is even more pronounced in the case of second-hand. The community that has suffered this effect is Castilla-La Mancha, where housing used is 6% cheaper than protected. In 2007, when prices touched the roof, the existing homes cost 29% more than those protected in the community.
By provinces, Teruel (social housing is 30% more expensive than used) and Cuenca (27.8%) takes the cake, but this effect also occurs in Jaén (16.5%), Ciudad Real (15 , 58%), León (12.5%), Toledo (7.9%), Lleida (5%), Ourense (3.33%) and Lugo (1%). In Madrid prices by housing type and another are very similar. In six communities also subsidized housing does not become even 10% cheaper than the second hand and 15% that the set of free, also the new building. This is the case of Castile and Leon, Valencia, Extremadura, Galicia, Murcia and La Rioja. Above average difference of Spain, are Catalonia, Madrid and the Basque Country, where the social cost half floors than second hand.
Construction fall
Professor of Applied Economics at the University Pompeu Fabra (UPF), José García-Montalvo, explains that this phenomenon was long happening. "The module prices a few years ago were too cheap, but now it is just the opposite," he says. However, García-Montalvo recalled that the austerity plans and the housing crisis have resulted in decreased construction of subsidized housing.
Indeed, the maximum prices for OPV in many cities far outweigh the average prices of private housing. That even happens in the cities of Madrid and Barcelona. In the Madrid region that occurs only in three locations of those appearing in the statistics data of Development-Aranjuez, Parla and Valdemoro-while in the province of Barcelona that happens in nine cities, including Sabadell or Terrassa. In three of them, the market price of the flats is even lower than the ceilings set for the special regime for social housing, which should go to the lowest incomes. That happens in Vic, Manresa and Igualada. And that regardless of the housing developments agreed price, a few years ago were located midway between the free and protected but now are out of market.
Freeze the modules
The Government has decided to freeze in the last four years the price of subsidized housing modules, but not lower them. The former Secretary of Housing Executive Ricard Catalan Fernandez explained that the reduction of the difference between both types of housing is mainly due to the collapse of the prices of used flats and maintenance of social value.
In his opinion, a solution could be to change various area municipalities-caps vary by area which is to lower the town-subsidized housing in cities that are charging more the bubble burst. So far, all indications are that this trend will continue to be given both by the expected decline of the flats, the loss of value provisionando banks are, for the sprint that is taking the fall in house prices.
Housing policy in Spain has traditionally been based on building affordable homes, especially property, for citizens who were outside the free market. At that time, many developers rejected the construction of floors protected because they got it to account, given the huge price difference with the market: according to the Ministry of Development, in 2007 social homes that cost half free. So the main concern of the authorities was to raise the maximum price allowed for public flats to attract private developers in this market. But that strategy did away with the bursting of the bubble.
Since prices reached highs in late 2008 before starting to deflate the value of private housing has fallen by 18.3%, while that of the protected only it has 1.7%. That closed the gap between private housing and protected. In five provinces, all the free-market homes both new and used, and are more expensive than social, but the difference is even more pronounced in the case of second-hand. The community that has suffered this effect is Castilla-La Mancha, where housing used is 6% cheaper than protected. In 2007, when prices touched the roof, the existing homes cost 29% more than those protected in the community.
By provinces, Teruel (social housing is 30% more expensive than used) and Cuenca (27.8%) takes the cake, but this effect also occurs in Jaén (16.5%), Ciudad Real (15 , 58%), León (12.5%), Toledo (7.9%), Lleida (5%), Ourense (3.33%) and Lugo (1%). In Madrid prices by housing type and another are very similar. In six communities also subsidized housing does not become even 10% cheaper than the second hand and 15% that the set of free, also the new building. This is the case of Castile and Leon, Valencia, Extremadura, Galicia, Murcia and La Rioja. Above average difference of Spain, are Catalonia, Madrid and the Basque Country, where the social cost half floors than second hand.
Construction fall
Professor of Applied Economics at the University Pompeu Fabra (UPF), José García-Montalvo, explains that this phenomenon was long happening. "The module prices a few years ago were too cheap, but now it is just the opposite," he says. However, García-Montalvo recalled that the austerity plans and the housing crisis have resulted in decreased construction of subsidized housing.
Indeed, the maximum prices for OPV in many cities far outweigh the average prices of private housing. That even happens in the cities of Madrid and Barcelona. In the Madrid region that occurs only in three locations of those appearing in the statistics data of Development-Aranjuez, Parla and Valdemoro-while in the province of Barcelona that happens in nine cities, including Sabadell or Terrassa. In three of them, the market price of the flats is even lower than the ceilings set for the special regime for social housing, which should go to the lowest incomes. That happens in Vic, Manresa and Igualada. And that regardless of the housing developments agreed price, a few years ago were located midway between the free and protected but now are out of market.
Freeze the modules
The Government has decided to freeze in the last four years the price of subsidized housing modules, but not lower them. The former Secretary of Housing Executive Ricard Catalan Fernandez explained that the reduction of the difference between both types of housing is mainly due to the collapse of the prices of used flats and maintenance of social value.
In his opinion, a solution could be to change various area municipalities-caps vary by area which is to lower the town-subsidized housing in cities that are charging more the bubble burst. So far, all indications are that this trend will continue to be given both by the expected decline of the flats, the loss of value provisionando banks are, for the sprint that is taking the fall in house prices.
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿