スペインの保守党の国民党の"闇献金"帳簿のLapuerta extesorero署名は、"闇献金"帳簿のものと非常に類似している
La firma del extesorero Lapuerta es muy parecida a la de los papeles
El antecesor de Bárcenas en las finanzas del PP dijo que el visado es “una imitación”
Toda la información sobre el 'caso Bárcenas'
J. A. H. / J. M. R. Madrid 17 ABR 2013 - 00:35 CET
Lapuerta extesorero signature is very similar to that of papers
Barcenas's predecessor PP's finances said the visa is "an imitation"
All information about the 'case Barcenas'
J. A. H. / J. M. R. Madrid 17 ABR 2013 - 00:35 CET
The firm / visa stamped on Alvaro PP extesorero test Lapuerta for writing body that was submitted to the Anti-corruption prosecutor Antonio Romeral is very similar to that appearing and attached to it in the papers called Barcenas, according is reflected in the court papers seen by COUNTRY and can be seen in the accompanying charts on this page.
COUNTRY
In the cited papers Barcenas, assumptions reflecting income Spanish big business donations and payments to almost the entire leadership of the party between 1990 and 2008, firms appear Lapuerta and his successor Luis Barcenas, promoted from manager to treasurer in 2008 after the arrival of Mariano Rajoy's PP for president. Barcenas and Lapuerta were subjected to that body of writing (of handwriting) last February 6 in the anti-corruption prosecutor to compare their letters and signatures to the papers contained in this newspaper that published on 31 January and on successive days.
The prosecutor Antonio Romeral Lapuerta purposely asked if it was his signature or visa contained in the sides of the paper, which, in accounting terms, means a visa for handwritten accounts by Barcenas in those notebooks. "It's not mine, it's like, to be an imitation" replied Lapuerta.
That day, in front of the prosecutor, and after declaring both Lapuerta Barcenas and underwent a police handwriting expert to dictation. Barcenas wrote five pages, with uppercase and lowercase letters and numbers. Both accepted.
Days before being brought before the prosecutor had refused Barcenas, in a television interview, the authenticity of the notebooks. And said he was willing to undergo few "calligraphic and polygraph tests" were necessary to prove that the letter of the papers did not belong. However, a week after the test is done, the police sent a report to Anticorruption asking that recur on both tests.
According to the report, Barcenas had deliberately disfigured his letter. Lapuerta not while exposing agents dictate the need for more figures to Lapuerta.
The report regarding Barcenas is devastating on handling that made his own handwriting, as you can see in the chart comparing of handwriting to which he was subjected in Anticorruption (on a dictation of municipal debt news Madrid) with your letter of the original letter to Swiss banking contained in such request received last November.
Experts say: "The body of writing made to judicial presence D. Luis Gutierrez Barcenas is not spontaneous, ie slow, careful, irregular writing and a wide variety of shades graphics do not own an automated script. " And added: "The start graph on the first two lines handwritten graph is of better quality than other written text, the graphic variety in performing the sectional type 'M' is diverse and distinct, are sometimes juxtaposed words and semiagrupadas a in others, the spelling 'I' is reviewed with tinkering with the words 'APPROVED', 'POSITIVE', 'MILLION', 'National', and additionally there are corrections, deletions (...) ".
The report concludes that it was "technically possible ruling on correspondence and possible authorship (...) of the manuscripts [Barcenas] and figures photocopying documents in the controversial". After inhibited the prosecutor in this case and take up the cause Judge Pablo Ruz of the National Court had no problem Lapuerta retake the exam. Barcenas refused. According interpret research sources, it was to hinder the investigation and prevent experts to give an opinion to certify whether the letter of the notebooks is yours. But his refusal has not stopped the investigation. Researchers have now asked the Senate handwritten disclosure of assets. That report is not yet developed.
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿