スペインの年金責任者は、社会保険加入費を引き下げて、付加価値税を引き上げる提案には反対。難色。
Empleo rechaza bajar cotizaciones y subir el IVA como reclama Bruselas
Tomás Burgos alerta de que una rebaja de cuotas puede poner en riesgo el sistema de pensiones
Manuel V. Gómez Madrid 22 ABR 2014 - 15:15 CET
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Jobs palms down prices and raise VAT as called Brussels
Tomás Burgos warns that a reduction in fees can put the pension system at risk
Manuel V. Gomez Madrid 22 ABR 2014 - 15:15 CET
A Social Security does not like the idea of lowering social contributions and raise VAT to offset the lost revenue. The so-called fiscal devaluation , as defined this alleged phenomenon of communicating vessels economists , is an option advocated by the experts to which the Government commissioned a report on tax reform and , above all, by the European Commission. But the head of the pension system , Tomás Burgos , sees " very difficult."
Not that Burgos believes that this measure is impossible to take: "It is possible to reduce fees if this is compensated with the same rates to pay 8,000 million payroll costs of pensions every month ." But Cinco Dias in forum , yes it has made it clear that he does not favor . He set an example . According to his calculations , to grow by one percentage point employment levels on there right now, about 163,000 jobs - would have to reduce social contributions between " five six points." This would mean that Social Security would lose , considering the revenue in 2013 , between 13,000 and 15,600 million. To compensate for this drop in revenue, the government would have to increase VAT in " eight or nine points." "I do not think anyone is thinking of a VAT of 29% ," he said .
Economic argument , Burgos added own one of the cash management of the pension system for deepening skepticism about the fiscal devaluation . The contributions provide a " stable and predictable " income to meet " the timely , accurate and complete payment [ 8,000 million per month ] ." In contrast, other taxes , including VAT , is highly seasonal behavior leading to the Secretary of State to question a lot: " The volatility of taxes makes this guarantee [ of the monthly payroll ] may be impaired ."
Put on the table the technical arguments , the Secretary of State appealed to the political reasons for their suspicion. "This is not an easy debate. It deserves a whole. Reduce or quote is not a debate. " According to Burgos , once the discussion is opened, what should be clear is that the system must " ensure adequate, stable and predictable resources."
Once finished the act , Burgos threw a dart to propose a fiscal devaluation . " All discussions are fine ," he said , but added that we should not stay in if prices go up or down , " that's nice " . Translation: if the measure does not ensure the financial viability of the system , then you have to face cuts. By the way, Burgos set position : "It is true that contributions are tax hard work, but I think the workers only receive more than they pay ."
However, the data did not facilitate responsible for Social Security to begin the debate is what the actual contribution rate paid by employers and employees . In theory the fee ranges from 36.25% of the contribution base of fixed contracts and 37.5 % of the time , including the amount paid for unemployment insurance . But this percentage is actually lower , since , as he himself explained Burgos , there are 54 bonuses and 22 reductions in contributions .
With regard to pension funds , whose taxation is addressed in the tax reform that the government is preparing the Secretary of State said that " if there is room for improvement in the tax treatment are welcome ." And at this point showed their preferences by choosing to favor pension plans that fall "within the scope of collective bargaining ."
Along the way the labor market during this month , which has been celebrated Easter, Burgos predicted that " April is a period of good news for Social Security."
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿