スペインのプレステージ Prestige 石油輸送船沈没事故の石油環境汚染災害の無責任裁判判決に、ガルシア南部の漁業組合は、判決に対する控訴の期限の延長を要求
Cofradías fuerzan que se amplíe el plazo para recurrir la sentencia del ‘Prestige’
El fallo “deficiente, con omisiones, posibles errores y puntos oscuros” dificulta, según los pósitos, la presentación de recursos
Paola Obelleiro A Coruña 15 NOV 2013 - 22:39 CET
Guilds force extended the deadline to appeal the judgment of the 'Prestige'
The "poor, with omissions, errors and obscurities" failure difficult, as the deposits, the lodging of appeals
Paola Obelleiro A Coruña 15 NOV 2013 - 22:39 CET
Guilds of southern Galicia presented yesterday at the Provincial Court of A Coruña written in asking for clarification , correction or supplement to the acquittal of the Prestige disaster . A failure to consider " poor , with clear omissions and obscurities transcendent potential errors " , making it very difficult to particular accusations filing an appeal to the Supreme Court . And also that the high court to assess, with all items, if that sentence really fits right . This request will allow the guilds input to all appearing parties in the case to gain time to decide whether or not turning . The deadline to announce his intention to go to the Supreme finishes on the 20th, but now is suspended until the room who judged the cause reply to this letter of clarification.
There are three reasons that led to the deposits of Pontevedra, represented by Alberto Muñoz, to present it. In its judgment of November 13 , the judges failed to respond to all requests made in its closing arguments at trial, each of the parties who have a 2,000 - are represented by 55 lawyers . And the court did not rule on one of the main demands of these brotherhoods : considered proven , as well effectively concludes the fault, the poor condition of the old oil with deficiencies in inspections and repairs which made it more suitable for scrap to navigate carries fuel limit fund to be provided by the vessel owner to cover its liability for pollution damage as required by international agreement to which they are subjected CLC/1992 both Spain and Prestige owners does not apply.
That limit is 22.77 million euros that the British insurer of the vessel deposited as bail, the accident occurred around 2002 , in the court of Corcubión . A currency whose fate should be decided when the statement is executed. But the policy covers Prestige billion euros. Fraternities want the court to rule on his request at trial , also collected by other special charges and the actual prosecution , that this limitation is lifted , as owners , owner and other responsible Tanker old breached the international Convention on civil liability for pollution to hide the bad condition of the ship and so that it should achieve all permits to navigate. Another clarification or correction of the judgment to ask these guilds is about three hours the captain , Apostolos Mangouras , was delayed in accepting the tanker trailer after his accident off Finisterre . The Greek Navy earned him the only sentence dictated in the sentence, nine months in prison for a serious crime of disobedience to the Spanish authorities . But the administration itself contributed to the delay, as he admitted , has all the details in its statement of defense , the lawyer who represented the state 's only official today accused and acquitted by the former director of Merchant Marine, Jose Luis Lopez - Sors . During those three hours maritime authorities negotiated with the owner and rescue company hired Smit Salvage , the tugboat assignment Vigo. " An authorization granted Sasemar actually ," admits the State Bar . Contrary to the court's decision , which held that the delay does not result in a liability in the disaster, the brotherhoods claim that he did have " negative and disastrous implications in the management of the crisis." The Prestige trailer without the delay, they could have done by day, with full visibility, calm sea and no time , remember Muñoz .
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿