サンチアゴ近郊のアンぐろいすの急曲りで、過剰速度で高速鉄道が脱線転覆し79人の乗客が死亡した事故で、サンチアゴ以前の12km(急カーブ アンゴロイスの4km前から)に速度制御自動停止(速度減速)装置を設置しなかったのは、建設費用の節約ではないと[高速鉄道建設費用をケチって安全を無いがしろにした!!]
El ministerio de Fomento niega el ahorro en Angrois que investiga el juez
El secretario general de Infraestructuras dice que la decisión de no instalar el ERTMS se debió a motivos técnicos
Consulte toda la información sobre el accidente
David Reinero Santiago 4 DIC 2013 - 00:45 CET
The Ministry of Public Works denied savings Angrois investigating judge
Infrastructure Secretary General said that the decision not to install ERTMS was due to technical reasons
See all the information about the accident
David Santiago Reinero 4 DIC 2013 - 00:45 CET
The Development Ministry said yesterday in Congress by investigating magistrate Santiago accident , linking security reduction curve Angrois ( Santiago ) which derailed the train Alvia "a cost reduction plan ." Asked by Rep. BNG Rosana Pérez , the secretary general of Infrastructure, Manuel Child, argued that the decision not to install ERTMS constant speed control to Santiago station but only up to four miles before Angrois was due to technical reasons .
Initially Ourense AVE -Santiago was to be built in standard gauge , but in 2010 the socialist government decided to open it with Iberian gauge , since even years to finish the tracks were on the other wide following both Santiago and Ourense . That change was what motivated as Child, that ERTMS is not installing it all the way and that access to the capital of Galicia operase only with lower system, ASFA spot speed control operating between A Coruña and Vigo, unable to stop the train before an oversight as it was the driver .
moreDrivers may only use the phone in emergenciesThe Xunta proposes to train experts in non-specialized
" These changes were not saving as motivation ," said Child, contradicting the judge, who has documents that quantify 26 million the money left to spend for the changes decided in 2010. Child also denied that circulate only with ASFA , who constantly monitors the train is less secure than with ERTMS , whose supervision is permanent. " We had to redefine the scope in which each is installed ," he said , but " all systems are safe if their rules served" .
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿