スペインの2011年に40年がたつGARONYA原発の2019年までの延長は、安全強化の設備投資に約1億0000'0000ユーロかかり、さらに新たな原発税が加わると採算が採れなく恐れがあるので、Endesa と Iberdrola企業は延長を申請するか検討中
La reforma energética deja en el aire la renovación de Garoña
El nuevo impuesto nuclear y la inversión por Fukushima amenazan con frustrar la prórroga
Rafael Méndez Madrid 14 AGO 2012 - 01:11 CET
Energy reform leaves in the air renewal Garoña
The new nuclear tax and investment by Fukushima are undermining the extension
Rafael Mendez Madrid 14 AGO 2012 - 01:11 CET
Energy reform that prepares the Government threatens to turn against one of the main efforts of the PP: the extension of nuclear Garoña. To run until 2019, the plant would have to make investments that the sector stands at 100 million by the requirements of the Nuclear Safety Council (CSN). To this is added the next tax announced by Industry Minister Jose Manuel Soria, nuclear waste. This has led Endesa and Iberdrola (owners of the plant to 50%) to consider whether or not the requested permit renewal, according to industry sources. The company says it is too early to estimate the impact of reform on their accounts.
The PP did not opt for the vagueness on the nuclear issue. Always bet on keeping Garoña, which in 2011 turned 40 years for which it was originally designed. Neither the Fukushima accident, the first reactor is twin to Garoña, changed the decision. While Germany, Switzerland, Italy and Belgium gave reverse its atomic plans, Industry published on July 3 Garoña order to maintain until 2019, six years after the closing date set by the Socialist Government.
Electrics wanted to get now 10-year extension, but warned that CSN did not have time to assess the conditions. Yes said I could try the record until 2019 because four years ago and analyzed documentation ingete overtime. Then the central exempted two major works-the change of miles of cables and insulation control room-which are now essential. Added to this are derivative works Fukushima, a bunker that serves as a refuge for workers in case of a major accident. A spokesman Nuclenor (Garoña operating society) said yesterday that they have not calculated how much would cost such works, although industry sources estimate that may be around 100 million. That, for a single 466 megawatt central (compared to 2,079 of the two reactors at Almaraz, for example), making it difficult to amortization.
The last cloud in the landscape of Central Burgos is the announcement of Industry Minister Jose Manuel Soria, to establish "a rate or fee for producing and storing nuclear waste," according to Europa Press said. Although electricity reform is delayed, according to the sector by the differences between Finance and Industry, is sure to include a cut to the remuneration of nuclear and hydro. These charge the same price kilovatio.hora a newly built gas central, although the former have recovered their costs and the latter not pay for water. The European Commission said in May that a portion of the 24,000 million accumulated tariff deficit is partly due to "overcompensation of some infrastructure, such as nuclear and large hydro."
Understanding the impact of the reform bills Garoña not easy. Jaume Morrón, renewable consultant expert says that last year made a profit Nuclenor 13,500,000 ordinary. With taxes and fees that has driven industry like megavatio.hora 10 euros, 31.5 million would pass losses, according Morrón.
The company states that these calculations can not be made because in recent years, and at the prospect of closure in 2013, has spent much of the income to repayments. The firm Iberdrola and sources do admit that work for the renovation, which is due in early September, but added that everything is in the air until we know the reform in detail.
An industry source electrical doubt that will drop Garoña, turned into a symbol: "They're doing numbers. The good thing is that it's Endesa and Iberdrola and may take some loss by keeping. If one would be very difficult. " Closing Garoña for economic reasons would a great joy to environmentalists, that would add to the criticism of the lack of security of the economic nonsense. Furthermore, Soria has insisted that Spain can not do without nuclear generation.
Traditionally sold nuclear power as a source of cheap, but at the prospect of a tax change discourse. "Whoever says that nuclear power is cheap is that he knows what he's talking," he said in March Eduaro Montes, president Unesa, the bosses of the big utilities.
That a nuclear shutdown because no economic sense is not so extraordinary in other countries. The Oyster Creek, twin to Garoña, agreed with the State of New Jersey close in 2019 (ten years before the expiry of their permission) for not investing in a cooling circuit.
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿