スペイン政府は財政危機のために、810万0000人の年金生活者の給与を物価上昇の2'9%以上ではなく、月額1000'00ユーロ以下の年金生活者は2%の引き上げ、月額1000ユーロ以上の年金生活者は1%の値上げに留まるので実質年金は1'9%から0'9%の引き下げ。
Las pensiones pierden más en un año con Rajoy que en toda la era Zapatero
La merma de poder adquisitivo de 1,9 puntos supera a los 1,2 puntos del PSOE
Entre 2004 y 2011, las prestaciones mínimas subieron en torno al 50%
Manuel V. Gómez Madrid 1 DIC 2012 - 00:36 CET
Pensions lose more in one year than in all Rajoy Zapatero was
The decline in purchasing power of 1.9 points to 1.2 points higher than the PSOE
Between 2004 and 2011, the minimum benefits rose by around 50%
Manuel V. Gomez Madrid 1 DIC 2012 - 00:36 CET
The pension management Zapatero did was very touched by a decision to freeze pensions in 2011. In the seven years of government, the minimum benefits rose to a dizzying pace. The rest had even gained purchasing power until it was freezing. But that decision was that profit ahead and made the final balance was negative (-1.2 percentage points). In contrast, in a single year of Mariano Rajoy Government pensions have been devalued over: 1.9 percentage points.
The first Council of Ministers of Rajoy, held on December 30, 2011, decreed an increase in pensions than 1%. He had to wait until November-the month of reference for the review, to see if the increase was sufficient. No it has not. Prices have risen by 2.9%.
But the benefits will not update Executive. So in the end, in 2012 the loss of purchasing power will be 1.9 points.
Initial escalation disappear in November 2013 if prices rise more than 2%
During the first six years of Zapatero, pensions had appreciated. Above all, they did the minimum, that at the end of the two terms were up about 50% in nominal terms (excluding inflation) and about 30 points improved purchasing power. But they had until 2011 before the rest, thanks to the gain of 1.7 points in 2009. In January three years ago the government had increased pensions by 2%, but then the collapse in demand dragged down prices, which rose only 0.3%. That gain fell short with the freeze of 2011 (of which escaped minimum pensions). Benefits stalled while prices rose 2.9%. So seven years balance was negative (-1.2).
For 2013 Rajoy has frozen pensions either. Will rise by 1% or 2%, but from what we have lost in 2012. Avoids much of the headlines that Zapatero devastated, although the effect is similar or worse.
In its decision, the government introduces some initial escalation. Pensions exceeding 1,000 euros (excluding in this calculation the prorated share of the extra pay) will rise by 1%. The rest, the vast majority (74% of total), 2%.
Escalation with expiration date
However, initial escalation disappear in November 2013 if prices rise more than 2%, if the government (unlike this year) and pension checks if the planned launch of the sustainability factor does not change the criteria update. According to the Ministry of Employment, the starting point for the theoretical review of 2013 would increase fixed, ie, 1% or 2%, respectively.
In addition to the partial suspension of Article 48 of the Social Security Act, which fixed the update, the Cabinet yesterday approved more major changes to the pension system. The decree changes the regulation of the Reserve Fund. Until yesterday, when the system went into structural deficit as the government argues has happened this year, you could use call pensions piggy bank to pay with a ceiling of 3% of annual expenditure on contributory pensions and management (3063 million in 2012). From today, this point is suspended in 2012, 2013 and 2014.
The gap between revenues and expenses has forced the government to use the savings from previous years. In summer he used the 4,000 million of surplus management Mutual of Accidents at work and in September and October 3000 the Reserve Fund. The suspension of the application of the limit for this year allows the government to resort to another 3,500 million to pay pensions in the remainder of the year. The gap will continue. Even grow in 2013. So next year it's likely that Social Security has to use more resources to the Reserve Fund.
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿