スペインの監査院は、自治州政府の2'500件の100億0000'0000ユーロの公共事業などの契約の不正や汚職や腐敗を摘発
INFORME DE FISCALIZACIÓN DE LA CONTRATACIÓN EN LAS 17 COMUNIDADES
El Tribunal de Cuentas destapa el germen de la corrupción en las autonomías
La auditoría halla múltiples ilegalidades en 2.500 expedientes por 10.000 millones
Las comunidades abusan del concurso en lugar de contratar mediante subasta
AUDIT REPORT OF TRADING ON THE COMMUNITIES 17 S
The Court of Audit uncovers the germ of corruption in the autonomous
The audit found multiple illegalities in 2,500 cases per 10,000 million
Communities contest abuse instead of hiring by auction
Francisco Mercado Madrid 18 NOV 2012 - 22:25 CET
The Court of Auditors complaint in its latest report on the management of severe uncontrolled regions in the procurement, where multiple commit illegalities that have led to serious cases of corruption are still investigating the courts.
The audit has analyzed about 2,500 contracts of all kinds (works, supplies, consultants and others) awarded by almost 10,000 million euros between 2006 and 2007.
Radiography of the Court of Auditors on the anomalies that occur in contracting communities hardcore draws conclusions on the use of public money by the autonomous governments.
The report of the Court of Auditors, which came six months ago the Congress of Deputies and has not yet been analyzed and discussed, expenditure management reels of all autonomy in 2006 and 2007. "No time to discuss this report because we delay," parliamentary sources say.
Scandals in court
'Case Gürtel' IN THE REGION. The courts investigating scores of awarding contracts to toe, often with the negotiated procedure without publication denouncing the Court of Auditors, the plot Gürtel. Furthermore, judges investigating whether private companies contracting with the Valencia ended up paying PP rallies across the Gürtel network.
'CASE OVER' in the Balearics. The judge in Palma de Mallorca investigates the multiple award contracts to finger the MC Over advertising company that, in turn, mounted rallies for PP Jaume Matas that were funded in part by contributions from hoteliers, or Over MC by itself due to the favorable treatment he received from the Balearic Government.
'CASE PALAU' IN CATALAN. The judicial investigation into the looting of the Palau de la Música uncovered numerous irregularities in the award of public works in Catalonia which allegedly paid kickbacks builders that financed the Democratic Convergence of Catalonia, one of the Catalan government parties.
The report is transparent in its analysis. And scores on a dozen of the 239 pages of studying all irregularities.
Offers unjustified. "Lack of justification for services developers need to contracts for the operation of public services or justifications for lack of a reasonable level of detail or insufficient justification for hiring costs have contributed to the relevant data, calculations and quantifications ".
Hash to avoid competition. "Fractionation Concerning the value of the contracts in order to process them using negotiated procedures without advertising or smaller contracts, as appropriate, thus obviating the procurement procedures and forms established to ensure compliance with the principles of transparency, openness and competition. "
False urgency. "Abuse urgent processing of cases, in many cases, without adequate justification, which involves halving the deadlines which sometimes involves a restriction of competition."
Abuse of competition instead of auction. "Using disproportionate majority of the competition to the detriment of the auction, ordinarily award of works, which was applied very sparingly though, absolutely regulated by the nature of the procedure, involving a lower risk of violation of the principles of transparency and objectivity and that, generally, allowed to have the biggest casualties notwithstanding the assurance of the media, the capacity and solvency of the tenderers ".
Via unjustified. "Lack of inadequate justification or lack of justification for the choice of procedure and method of procurement, in particular, of the legal standards that allowed the joint procurement and construction projects."
Lack of criteria "Poor establishment of the award criteria in particular administrative clauses of the contests to express not accurately or not set the methodology for their application and for assigning scores for scales, or set aspects as criteria that should be used only for admission to tenders, concerning the valuation of material and human resources or business experience. In some cases, higher scores were established for bidders who credited or linked media experience with the respective autonomous community, which is contrary to the principles of equality and non-discrimination, and not always accurately set limits to variants or alternatives could establish the bidders, implying particular difficulty for a uniform and objective evaluation of the bids. "
No technical data. "Poor foundation of awards for competitions in technical reports evaluating bids without giving reasons or improperly motivated."
Low strange. "Inadequate assessment of low prices of offers in the specifications and / or valuation reports of contests, without stating circumstances that could justify this action that is inconsistent with the principle of economy in the management of public funds. Often, the findings of recklessness in the low offered did not meet legal requirements. "
No advertising. "Lack of legal justification of the assumptions that allow the use of negotiated procedures without advertising, involving the exclusion of contracts thus allocated advertising and free competition, the greater discretion in selecting the winners and which also not usually obtained significant casualties, particularly when it invoked the existence of extreme urgency or a single employer so trained to perform the corresponding benefits. "
Modifying contracts. "Modifications of contracts in progress, particularly of works that do not respond to new needs arising during implementation, but unforeseen factors and deficiencies in preparatory proceedings and without, generally, stating the requirement of the relevant responsibilities and / or compensation for damages to administrations. Occasionally, improperly processed as some additional contracts that actually contain modifications constituted actions whose execution was absolutely necessary and inseparable from those initially planned. "
Medical bills. While some autonomous now scavenge different formulas or copayment privatization in health, including euro per prescription, the report of expenditures in 2006 and 2007 denouncing the "poor record of compliance with Administration invoices for supplies of consumables or of medical equipment to hospitals and public health services. "
Consulting bulk. "In consulting contracts, assistance or services, lack of justification with a reasonable degree of realization of the impossibility of performance of the services with personal media or materials from government."
All these anomalies reported by the Court of Auditors in its latest report on regional management still occur judging from ongoing cases in courts across the country.
スペインの監査院は、自治州政府の2'500件の100億0000'0000ユーロの公共事業などの契約の不正や汚職や腐敗を摘発
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿