欧州連合国家予算の歳出削減は、欧州の将来の削減
EDITORIAL
La UE recorta en futuro
La agónica negociación de las cuentas se aplaza, al tiempo que priman las políticas del pasado
El País 25 NOV 2012 - 00:01 CET
EDITORIAL
The cuts in future EU
The agonizing negotiation is deferred accounts, while past policies prevail
The Country 25 NOV 2012 - 00:01 CET
It is not pose a real fiscal federalism, which would be needed to combat the crisis and to establish the Union sought. Although a strong EU budget would be the way to escape the strict national austerity, this is also imposed on the EU accounts. But with a budget equivalent to a mere 1% of GDP of the Twenty, the EU should at least ensure that you have sufficient funds in the next seven-year period (2014-2020) to implement common policies. Not for those. Europe looks forward to the future as crabs, prioritizing policies that represent the past.
The divorce between rich, who pay more than they receive Community funds, and States receiving funds, which adds intransigent position of David Cameron intended to hijack the discussion to appease the Eurosceptics in Parliament Westminster, has prevented an agreement in the European Council. The cuts in London wants to impose all but the British rebate, of course, are a way of saying no to more Europe. Again, what we need to have as agonizing negotiations, the possibility of an agreement was postponed to a marathon meeting earlier this year.
What has emerged in Brussels for the summit without results is worrisome. Not only because of the tendency to cut it all in a Union that ran out of funding this year for the crucial Erasmus student exchange-just a drop in the EU budget, but because the priorities seem disrupted. Compared to the proposal from the European Commission, one billion euros for the seven years, the attempt to compromise Van Rompuy, President of the European Council, the game cuts to the stated priority of the EU 2020 Strategy : that of the "competitiveness for growth and employment", including R & D + i. Are you going to measure and Europe to the U.S. or China? They also suffer a hack programs "Connecting Europe", whether in transport, energy and telecommunications. By contrast, with the maintenance of the items of the Common Agricultural Policy, the EU seems to bet more on the past than the future. There is still time to rectify.
Burning can be saved, luckily, cohesive policies, although it reduces the maximum (2.35% of GDP) than they can receive the most needy regions and states. Spain will benefit, if agreed, the new mode of transition regions, but in the seven-will become a net contributor. Although this perspective is to change the attitude of the Government, it has entered into negotiations without new ideas. The Commission itself has them: less money for infrastructure, which then must be maintained, and for job creation and training SMEs in Spain. No walks misguided.
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿