スペインの不良債権で破綻して国有化されたBANKIA銀行の会計のカラクリ、会計操作の疑いをスペイン国立銀行に要求
El jeroglífico de las cuentas de Bankia
Anticorrupción ha pedido al Banco de España que determine si hubo "artificios contables"
Íñigo de Barrón Madrid 19 NOV 2012 - 00:34 CET
The hieroglyph of Bankia accounts
Corruption has asked the Bank of Spain to determine whether there were "accounting gimmicks"
Barron Íñigo Madrid 19 NOV 2012 - 00:34 CET
The BFA-Bankia accounts have become difficult to decipher hieroglyphics even for an expert. So it is not surprising that the anti-corruption prosecutor has asked a few weeks ago that the Bank of Spain inspectors prepare an expert report on the hole Bankia to determine whether the company made "accounting gimmicks" or included "improperly recorded transactions" in their accounts 2010 and 2011. Do not forget that Rodrigo Rato, president of the group, presented in May 2012 with the CNMV some accounts (unaudited) with a profit of 309 million. These results were restated at the end of May that the new managers had determined that loss of 2.979 million.
Is it true the credit report of December 2011 or March 2012? Did Bankia profit or loss? Rato, in his appearance in the House of Representatives last July, said that it depends on whether you want to charge against results "possible future damage. The profit of 306 million in 2011 was true to life, "he said, and only changed" because the new team decided to have bad credit, paying royal decree by the last government and worst economic expectations. "
This apparent financial engineering makes white things in black is also reflected in the reports of the inspectors, who are changing over time. However, the evidence of Oliver Wyman who examined all banks, Bankia determined that a hole was 24,743,000, which removes the reason to Rato and gives it to his successor, José Ignacio Goirigolzarri.
So why the Bank of Spain, Miguel Fernández Ordóñez to the head, these complimentary reports made and allowed to send to the CNMV Bankia a profit of 309 million? The answer is that the governor forced to make very strong endowments closing Bankia in 2011 (speaking of the March 2012 report of the inspectors) and it was believed that the group could move forward alone, after receiving a new injection of public money of 7,000 million. That's why I supported all the way. In return he demanded another CEO Rato himself and stop being president. But Economy Minister Luis de Guindos, did not believe in the viability of the project and forced march to reach Goirigolzarri Rato. In the midst of these battles were inspectors Bank of Spain, in a delicate position that does not always permit consistency.
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿