スペインの雇用·社会保険省のFatima Banyezは、集団解雇の拡大を拒否
Báñez rechaza facilitar todavía más los despidos colectivos
La ministra Báñez defiende que la caída de la temporalidad se debe a la reforma laboral y no a la gran destrucción de empleo temporal
Manuel V. Gómez Madrid 26 MAR 2013 - 18:55 CET
Banez rejects further facilitate collective redundancies
Banez Minister argues that the fall is due to temporary labor reform and not the vast destruction of temporary employment
Manuel V. Gomez Madrid 26 MAR 2013 - 18:55 CET
The Government does not intend to go further to facilitate collective redundancies. It did in the labor reform ended the administrative approval of the ERE and defined as objective cause for dismissal turnover falling for three consecutive quarters. But many face in court records because they do not respect administrative procedures. "Sounds good to annul the ERE for formal reasons," settled Employment Minister Fatima Banez.
Banez words have answered the question of CiU spokesman in the Committee on Employment of the Congress of Deputies, Carles Campuzano, who asked if the executive considers any change at this point, which sued their training and amendments labor reform. Easier to dismiss and, consequently, the lowering was offset, in part, with increased documentation requirements and strict trading period, as already made clear, more than one statement can not be limited to talks formal. This second part has helped many judgments end up canceling collective redundancies for formal reasons, which has drawn complaints from employers grandstands and labor offices typically represent business interests.
Minister Banez has appeared in Congress to discuss the labor market before the Committee on Employment. Given that comprise deputies is determined to defend the labor reform and seeking data to support their position. "You get a moderation of the decline in employment," said Banez, although in 2012, a year when job destruction was far superior to any other of the crisis given that the recession was less than in 2009. Jobs insists on highlighting every time you have occasion to emphasize that the decline of jobs is slowing. Against this argument, found yesterday PNV spokesman, Emilio Olavarria: "Otherwise, with six million unemployed people, forget it."
"The EU forecasts are alarming. Unemployment will rise to 27% in 2013. Did not seem unbearable this data?", Has questioned the Socialist spokesman, Concha Gutierrez, who has also criticized cuts Banez Insurance unemployment. To respond, the Minister has used that Felipe Gonzalez snips benefits realized in the last two decades.
On projections, Banez has used the national accounts data, and has accused the PSOE their continued failure forecasts for the governments of Zapatero. Banez stressed that the Government planned destruction of 610,000 jobs in 2012 and ended up being little more than 690,000.
Sounds good to annul the formal defects ERE
Fatima Banez, Minister for Employment
When quantifying the total destruction of jobs last year, Banez has always relied upon this figure, leaving the national accounts. Banez prefer this statistic to the EPA, which concludes that evaporated 850,000 or Social Security, which lost almost 790,000 contributors. Amen to that EPA and national accounts statistics are different, we must bear in mind that the first measures the full-time employment, while the other provides full-time employment and part-time.
Banez has also drawn by falling chest of temporality in 2012 to 23%, two points less than the end of 2011. The minister has linked this fact with the rise of permanent contracts, which grew over the past year, and reform measures. However, as EPA's own evidence this decline comes from the destruction of almost half a million jobs, nearly half of wage employment destroyed when storms come to assume one in four employees. This was the argument used by the Plural Left spokeswoman, Joan Coscubiela. "You do not distinguish between jobs and contracts", has accused the Catalan deputy, in a tough speech to the minister accused of lying repeatedly: "There have been many people in history who, by repeating the same lie, has been successful, but overall very harshly judged History mendacity ".
To defend its reform, Banez also used data from autonomous, "has grown by 54,000." However, this number does not match the Social Security affiliation in 2012 when independent contributors fell by 47,000. To make that claim, the minister usually benefit from the EPA, in the category of self-employed without employees. What happens is that when you climb this section and no similar behavior in affiliation what happens is that many people, in the absence of alternative employment, has no choice but to seek income in this way.
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿