http;//elpais.com
新しい東京電力福島原発災害の調査報告書は、政府の規制機関の原子力安全庁と東京電力は、原発事故の危険性を無視していたと発表
Otro informe sobre Fukushima culpa del accidente al Gobierno y a la empresa
El panel de expertos creado por el Ejecutivo concluye que se ignoraron los riesgos de accidente
Another report on the accident Fukushima blame the government and the company
The panel of experts established by the Executive concludes that ignored the risk of accidents
SPECIAL Fukushima nuclear accident
The Fukushima disaster "was a human error could have been avoided"
Agencies Tokyo 23 JUL 2012 - 09:55 CET
The panel of experts established by the Executive concludes that ignored the risk of accidents
SPECIAL Fukushima nuclear accident
The Fukushima disaster "was a human error could have been avoided"
Agencies Tokyo 23 JUL 2012 - 09:55 CET
A new expert report released today in Japan believes that Tepco, which owns the nuclear plant in Fukushima, and the country's government "ignored the risks" and "relied too much" in the security of the plant to cope with a as the tsunami that caused the accident in March 2011. The report said the company had a capacity "weak" to respond to a crisis like that because its employees had not been trained.
"The company and regulators were too confident and thought that events worse than those included in their estimates would not happen, and were not aware that measures to prevent the worst case scenario had many holes," says the report. "Both the government and companies should establish a new philosophy on the prevention of natural disasters, regardless of the likelihood that they occur," he adds.
The document, which contains the final conclusions of the committee established by the Government to investigate the disaster in Fukushima, published just 18 days after another report, signed by an expert panel convened by the Nippon parliament, also consider that the disaster " could have been prevented "if regulators and the company had adopted international safety standards.
more informationLife & Arts: Self-criticism atomicJourney to the heart of the disaster a year laterPHOTO GALLERY of the disaster scenarios then and nowThe situation of the Fukushima nuclear power is worse than thoughtJapan is the first time since 1970 without nuclear
The letter of today coincides with this conclusion and considers that the regulatory bodies were bent on keeping intact the myth of nuclear security before the accident. In this regard, stresses that the Nuclear Safety Agency strongly opposed in 2006 to implement a plan to strengthen preparedness for a possible nuclear disaster for fear that made people doubt the safety of nuclear facilities in Japan.
The study considers that the government could have reduced the exposure to radioactive emissions from the people living near Fukushima effectively if you used your computer system to predict the spread of contaminants.
The Government's expert committee estimated that the direct involvement of former Prime Minister Naoto Kan, who decided to visit the plant the day after the onset of the crisis, was "more harmful effects" than good because it could confuse the technical center.
The document, nearly 450 pages, called the State and Tepco deeper into the investigation into the accident, which ensures that there are many unclear points. For example, the manner in which radioactive substances were released to the outside.
"The company and regulators were too confident and thought that events worse than those included in their estimates would not happen, and were not aware that measures to prevent the worst case scenario had many holes," says the report. "Both the government and companies should establish a new philosophy on the prevention of natural disasters, regardless of the likelihood that they occur," he adds.
The document, which contains the final conclusions of the committee established by the Government to investigate the disaster in Fukushima, published just 18 days after another report, signed by an expert panel convened by the Nippon parliament, also consider that the disaster " could have been prevented "if regulators and the company had adopted international safety standards.
more informationLife & Arts: Self-criticism atomicJourney to the heart of the disaster a year laterPHOTO GALLERY of the disaster scenarios then and nowThe situation of the Fukushima nuclear power is worse than thoughtJapan is the first time since 1970 without nuclear
The letter of today coincides with this conclusion and considers that the regulatory bodies were bent on keeping intact the myth of nuclear security before the accident. In this regard, stresses that the Nuclear Safety Agency strongly opposed in 2006 to implement a plan to strengthen preparedness for a possible nuclear disaster for fear that made people doubt the safety of nuclear facilities in Japan.
The study considers that the government could have reduced the exposure to radioactive emissions from the people living near Fukushima effectively if you used your computer system to predict the spread of contaminants.
The Government's expert committee estimated that the direct involvement of former Prime Minister Naoto Kan, who decided to visit the plant the day after the onset of the crisis, was "more harmful effects" than good because it could confuse the technical center.
The document, nearly 450 pages, called the State and Tepco deeper into the investigation into the accident, which ensures that there are many unclear points. For example, the manner in which radioactive substances were released to the outside.
事故福島上の別の報告書は、政府と会社を非難
エグゼクティブによって確立された専門家のパネルには、事故の危険性を無視したと結論づけている
SPECIAL福島原発事故
福島県災害"は避けられたかもしれない人間のエラーが発生しました"
機関東京23 JUL 2012 - 09:55 CET
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿