http;//elpais.com
スペインの私たちの海岸を乱開発·狂瀾住宅建設から守るために
En defensa de nuestra costa
In defense of our coast
DOWNLOADABLE Manifesto for the preservation and management of coastal areas
Joan Romero / ORIOL Nel.lo / ONOFRE Rullan 12 JUL 2012 - 14:50 CET
DOWNLOADABLE Manifesto for the preservation and management of coastal areas
Joan Romero / ORIOL Nel.lo / ONOFRE Rullan 12 JUL 2012 - 14:50 CET
In May 2006, in the housing boom, a group of citizens dedicated to the study and management of the territory urge the manifesto for a new culture of the territory. The text warned of environmental risks, economic and social predation of the territory involved, the abuse of natural resources, employment accelerated soil and landscape degradation. Unfortunately, much of the stated risks are now so evident. Spanish society is now facing a grave economic crisis, which originates largely in the huge urban development and, in particular the expansion of the real estate sector in the period 1996-2007. Very negative effects that all this is having on the evolution of employment, stability of the Spanish economy, confidence in the financial system and the solvency of the government are unquestionable. Its social consequences, environmental, urban and landscape for decades weighed on Spanish society.
Again, those who promoted this manifesto and many other professionals and researchers we believe in the obligation to react to the announcements of the Government of Spain to radically change the provisions of the Coastal Act of 1988. We believe that the government proposal to introduce far more rational management of coastal areas repeat such an offense, in our opinion, in many past mistakes. If successful, highly damaging to the entire Spanish coast and especially to coastal areas that still have outstanding natural values. The coastal area is very fragile in nature and has been subjected in recent decades under enormous pressure, which has led to the occupation and artificiality of large areas. A process which, if not tamed and corrected mortgage could come to an irreversible environmental quality and attractiveness of our coast. Could we imagine the situation from our shores after the urbanization process in recent decades without this policy instrument?
The proposed revision of the law announced by Minister Miguel Arias Cañete "in order to reconcile the protection of the coastline with the development of economic activities and legal certainty" part, to our knowledge, of misdiagnosis: the contrast between environmental sustainability and economic development in coastal areas. As we know, reality tells us exactly the opposite: the competitiveness of tourism lies in an increasingly clearer on factors such as landscape quality and identity of the place. Sustainable management of the coastal territory is certainly a social and environmental obligations, but is also a compelling economic imperative.
The reform could jeopardize an irreversible environmental quality and attractiveness of our coastline
Also, the announcement that will proceed to the "recovery of degraded land for the development of economic activities by encouraging the retirement of public domain spaces that no longer require special protection for losing its natural" could be as an incentive to the degradation of coastal areas after privatization. The proposal does not take into account either the formula given to the burned forest areas (prohibition of urban reclassification and qualification for an extended period of time) and the alteration or declassification of protected natural areas that require accreditation to avoid spurious actions, that degradation has occurred through natural evolution.
The privatization of large coastal areas that changing the law could lead to irreparable loss would result in a collective. This state would relinquish his unwavering responsibility to preserve and eventually the costs would be incurred in breach of international commitments on the environment signed by Spain. Also, you should note that location of buildings, infrastructure and economic activities permanently in coastal areas is to expose people and property to natural hazards increasing, which is projected medium and long term will be increased by the effects of climate change process. The government can not ignore this reality and these scientific scenarios without incurring grave responsibilities in economic, social and moral.
We consider that coastal protection is a moral obligation. It is not morally defensible to favor private interests at the expense of public goods. It is not politically sustainable defense of particular interests to the detriment of general interest. Those who have the constitutional obligation to protect, preserve and promote policies that respond to a new culture of the territory, now undisputed developed and learned societies, announced initiatives that will accentuate the degradation, fragmentation sector, deregulation and so unsustainable practices as indefensible in civic or political forums of any developed country. Advance line of privatization, in fact or in law, is betting on a scorched earth policy that, once exhausted, would involve enormous costs of repair will fall on the shoulders of all. Common goods, such as coastal public domain can not be at the mercy of private rights as their management is strategic and costly repairs.
Nel.lo Oriol, a professor at the Autonomous University of Barcelona, Onofre Rullan, University of the Balearic Islands, and Joan Romero, University of Valencia have signed this also signed by teachers and researchers: Salvador Anton, Eugene Burriel Carmen Delgado, Josefina Gomez Mendoza, Josep-Maria Gili, Javier Martín-Vide, Rafael Mata, Angel Menendez Rexach, Guillermo Morales, Oriol Nel · lo, Jose Ojeda, Luciano Parejo, Joan Romero, Onofre Rullan, Joan Subirats, Fernando Vera and Florencio Zoido.
Again, those who promoted this manifesto and many other professionals and researchers we believe in the obligation to react to the announcements of the Government of Spain to radically change the provisions of the Coastal Act of 1988. We believe that the government proposal to introduce far more rational management of coastal areas repeat such an offense, in our opinion, in many past mistakes. If successful, highly damaging to the entire Spanish coast and especially to coastal areas that still have outstanding natural values. The coastal area is very fragile in nature and has been subjected in recent decades under enormous pressure, which has led to the occupation and artificiality of large areas. A process which, if not tamed and corrected mortgage could come to an irreversible environmental quality and attractiveness of our coast. Could we imagine the situation from our shores after the urbanization process in recent decades without this policy instrument?
The proposed revision of the law announced by Minister Miguel Arias Cañete "in order to reconcile the protection of the coastline with the development of economic activities and legal certainty" part, to our knowledge, of misdiagnosis: the contrast between environmental sustainability and economic development in coastal areas. As we know, reality tells us exactly the opposite: the competitiveness of tourism lies in an increasingly clearer on factors such as landscape quality and identity of the place. Sustainable management of the coastal territory is certainly a social and environmental obligations, but is also a compelling economic imperative.
The reform could jeopardize an irreversible environmental quality and attractiveness of our coastline
Also, the announcement that will proceed to the "recovery of degraded land for the development of economic activities by encouraging the retirement of public domain spaces that no longer require special protection for losing its natural" could be as an incentive to the degradation of coastal areas after privatization. The proposal does not take into account either the formula given to the burned forest areas (prohibition of urban reclassification and qualification for an extended period of time) and the alteration or declassification of protected natural areas that require accreditation to avoid spurious actions, that degradation has occurred through natural evolution.
The privatization of large coastal areas that changing the law could lead to irreparable loss would result in a collective. This state would relinquish his unwavering responsibility to preserve and eventually the costs would be incurred in breach of international commitments on the environment signed by Spain. Also, you should note that location of buildings, infrastructure and economic activities permanently in coastal areas is to expose people and property to natural hazards increasing, which is projected medium and long term will be increased by the effects of climate change process. The government can not ignore this reality and these scientific scenarios without incurring grave responsibilities in economic, social and moral.
We consider that coastal protection is a moral obligation. It is not morally defensible to favor private interests at the expense of public goods. It is not politically sustainable defense of particular interests to the detriment of general interest. Those who have the constitutional obligation to protect, preserve and promote policies that respond to a new culture of the territory, now undisputed developed and learned societies, announced initiatives that will accentuate the degradation, fragmentation sector, deregulation and so unsustainable practices as indefensible in civic or political forums of any developed country. Advance line of privatization, in fact or in law, is betting on a scorched earth policy that, once exhausted, would involve enormous costs of repair will fall on the shoulders of all. Common goods, such as coastal public domain can not be at the mercy of private rights as their management is strategic and costly repairs.
Nel.lo Oriol, a professor at the Autonomous University of Barcelona, Onofre Rullan, University of the Balearic Islands, and Joan Romero, University of Valencia have signed this also signed by teachers and researchers: Salvador Anton, Eugene Burriel Carmen Delgado, Josefina Gomez Mendoza, Josep-Maria Gili, Javier Martín-Vide, Rafael Mata, Angel Menendez Rexach, Guillermo Morales, Oriol Nel · lo, Jose Ojeda, Luciano Parejo, Joan Romero, Onofre Rullan, Joan Subirats, Fernando Vera and Florencio Zoido.
私たちの海岸を守るために 沿岸域の保全と管理のためのダウンロード可能なマニフェストジョーン·ロメロ/オリオールNel.lo/ ONOFRE Rullan12 JUL 2012 - 14:50 CET
2006年5月に、住宅ブームで、地域の研究と管理に特化し、市民のグループが地域の新しい文化のためにマニフェストを強くお勧めします。環境リスク、関係する地域の経済と社会の捕食、天然資源の乱用を警告したテキストが、雇用は、土壌や景観の劣化を加速させた。残念ながら、多く述べられたリスクは、ここで明らかである。スペインの社会は今、巨大な都市開発に主として由来し、期間1996年から2007年の不動産セクターの特定の拡大で深刻な経済危機に直面しています。すべてのこれはスペイン経済の雇用、安定性の進化に抱えていることは非常にマイナスの影響は、金融システムの信頼性と政府の支払能力は疑う余地があります。何十年もの間、その社会的影響、環境、都市や風景は、スペイン社会に秤量した。
再び、このマニフェストおよび他の多くの専門家や研究者を促進する人々は、我々は根本的に1988年の海岸法の規定を変更するには、スペイン政府の発表に反応する義務を信じています。我々は、沿岸地域のはるかに合理的な管理を導入する政府案は、多くの過去の過ちで、我々の意見では、そのような犯罪を繰り返すと信じています。成功した場合、非常に全体スペインの海岸に、特に未解決自然の価値を持っている沿岸地域への損傷。沿岸地域は、自然の中で非常に脆弱で、大面積の占領と人工につながっている巨大な圧力の下に最近数十年間にさらされてきました。飼いや住宅ローンを修正していない場合、プロセスは私達の海岸の不可逆的な環境の質と魅力に来る可能性があります。私たちは海岸から数十年で都市化のプロセス後に、この政策手段なしで状況を想像するだろうか？
法律の改正案では、誤診の、我々の知る限り、一部 "経済活動と法的確実性の開発と海岸線の保護を調整するために、"大臣ミゲル·アリアスカニェテ発表された：コントラスト沿岸地域における環境の持続可能性と経済発展の間に。私たちが知っているように、現実はまったく反対のことを教えてくれる：観光の競争力はその場所の景観の質やアイデンティティなどの要因にますます明確にあります。沿岸地域の持続可能な管理は確かに社会的、環境的な義務でなく、説得力のある経済が不可欠です。
改革は私たちの海岸線の不可逆的な環境の質と魅力を損なう可能性がある
また、 "もはや、その自然が失われるために特別な保護を必要としないことをパブリックドメイン空間の退職を奨励することによって経済活動の発展のために荒廃地の回復"に進みますアナウンスが考えられ民営化後の沿岸地域の劣化へのインセンティブとして。提案は考慮に焼けた森林地域（長期間のための都市再分類し、資格の禁止）と認定を必要とする自然保護地域の変更または機密解除に与えられた式のいずれかを取りませんスプリアスアクションを避けるために、その劣化は自然な進化を通じて発生しました。
法を変更すると、取り返しのつかない損失につながる可能性が大きい沿岸地域の民営化は、集団にもたらすでしょう。この状態は維持するために、彼の揺るぎない責任を放棄するだろうし、最終的にコストがスペインによって署名された環境に関する国際的約束に違反して発生するでしょう。また、中長期的に投影され、増加する自然災害に人々とプロパティを公開することである沿岸地域に恒久的な建物、インフラ、経済活動のその場所に注意してくださいの影響によって増加されます気候変動プロセス。政府は、経済的、社会的、道徳的に重大な責任を負うことなく、この現実と、これらの科学的なシナリオを無視することはできません。
我々は、沿岸の保護は道徳上の義務であると考えている。それが公共財を犠牲にして私的利益を優先するために道徳的に正当ではありません。それは一般的に関心のある損害に特定の利害関係の政治的に持続可能な防御ではありません。地域の新しい文化に対応するポリシーを、保護し維持し、促進するための憲法上の義務を持っている人は、現在議論の余地のない開発と学習社会は、劣化、断片化部門、規制緩和など持続不可能な慣行を強調するイニシアチブを発表しましたすべての先進国の市民や政治フォーラムのように弁解の余地のない。実際にまたは法律で民営化の事前の行は、修理の莫大な費用がすべての肩の上に落ちる伴うだろう、一度枯渇し、焦土作戦に賭けている。その管理は、戦略的かつ高価な修理であるような海岸沿いのパブリックドメインなどの一般的な品物は、私権のなすがままにすることはできません。
Nel.loオリオール、バルセロナ、Onofre Rullan、バレアレス諸島大学、ジョーン·ロメロの自治大学教授、バレンシア大学、教師や研究者によって署名され、これを署名した：サルバドールアントン、ユージンBurrielカルメン·デルガド、ジョセフィーナゴメスメンドーサ、ジョセップ·マリア·ギリ、ハビエル·マルティン-Videの、ラファエル·マタ、エンジェルメネンデスRexach、ギジェルモ·モラレス、オリオールネル·LO、ホセ·オヘダ、ルチアーノParejo、ジョーン·ロメロ、Onofre Rullan、ジョーンSubirats、フェルナンドベラとフロZoido。
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿