スペインの国立裁判所はCaja Madrid カハマドリード の詐欺てき優先株式販売でMiguel Blesaを調査
La Audiencia Nacional investigará a Blesa por las preferentes de Caja Madrid
El juez Andreu también investigará a seis exconsejeros y dos directivos de la entidad
Sospecha que Caja Madrid engañó sobre la naturaleza de las preferentes
Entre los implicados está el expresidente de la CEOE y de Marsans, Gerardo Díaz Ferrán
La Audiencia estudiará el viernes la posible nulidad del ‘caso Blesa’
ESPECIAL Caso Bankia
ESPECIAL Caso Blesa
Agencias Madrid 12 JUN 2013 - 17:04 CET
The National Court will investigate preferred Blesa by Caja Madrid
The judge Andreu also investigate six former directors and two directors of the entity
Caja Madrid suspect deceived about the nature of the preferred
Among those involved is the president of the CEOE and Marsans, Gerardo Diaz Ferran
The Court will consider Friday the possible invalidity of the 'case Blesa'
SPECIAL Bankia Case
SPECIAL Blesa Case
Agencies Madrid 12 JUN 2013 - 17:04 CET
The National Court judge Fernando Andreu investigate the president of Caja Madrid, Miguel Blesa, six former directors of the company, including the president of the employer, Gerardo Diaz Ferran, and two exdirectivos, for the marketing of the preference shares. The judge, however, excluded from the investigation to the president of the CNMV, Julio Segura. Following this decision, the former president of Caja Madrid enters the same 'case Bankia' by which is also being investigated his successor, Rodrigo Rato, in relation to the IPO of the company. Besides this cause, Blesa has gone to court for credit millionaire Diaz Ferran and Florida National purchase. For this second case for which is held without bail since last Thursday.
In a car, the judge has admitted a charge of a retired businessman who spent 170,000 euros to these products. According to the complaint, "the company allegedly deceived not only the nature of the product but placed the shares with investors at face value, which was much higher than fair value."
moreThe judge opens the criminal from the sale and issuance of the preferredDictates consumption over the first preferred awards BankiaCorruption does not see crime in selling Bankia preferredThe judge again Miguel Blesa send to jail and this time without bailAuto DOWNLOADABLE admission of the complaint
The complaint was also directed against those who were members of the Board of Directors of the box responsible for the issuance of these hybrid products: Gonzalo Martín Pascual, Jesús Pedroche, Rodolfo Benito, Jose Manuel Fernandez and Jose Maria Arteta Norniella. The of this entrepreneur is the third lawsuit accepted in the piece that already preferred investigated.
The judge's decision comes two days after the magistrate opened criminal proceedings in the case of preferred admit Bankia to hear a lawsuit filed by Union Progress and Democracy (UPyD) against Bankia, its parent Banco Financiero y de Savings, Bancaja and the six responsible for the prospectuses for these products. The judge excluded from the investigation to the president of the National Commission on the Securities Market, Julio Segura, and former governor of the Bank of Spain, Miguel Angel Fernandez Ordonez.
The admissibility of the complaint for the alleged commission of the crimes of fraud, misappropriation, false advertising, and fraudulent administration plot to alter the price of the things the judge decided against the opinion of the anti-corruption prosecutor, not committing a crime appreciated in marketing preferred.
Judge Andreu, but stressed in the car that responded to the complaint of UPyD that the admission of the complaint was not yet an act of judicial imputation, argued that he could not rule out "without having made a minimum of instructional activity inquisitorial "the criminal nature of the allegations.
Furthermore, in response to the prosecutor, the head of the Court of Instruction No. 4 of the said Audiencia share with the prosecution "the thin red line" that can separate in such acts, the criminal offense of tort, but insisted that there is "absolutely" ruled out the first one. "It's not about the product or high-risk financial products marketed were legal, they were, but if your marketing and negotiation hid the true situation of the investee by preferentistas and the real risks they incurred to invest in these products, "he argued Andreu.
スペインの国立裁判所はCaja Madrid カハマドリード の詐欺てき優先株式販売でMiguel Blesaを調査
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿