Rato compartía el diagnóstico de que “BFA no es una entidad viable”
El Banco de España asegura que el dirigente compartía su diagnóstico
Francisco Mercado Madrid 25 SEP 2012 - 20:44 CET
Rato shared diagnosis that "BPA is not a viable entity"
The Bank of Spain says the leader shared his diagnosis
Francisco Mercado Madrid 25 SEP 2012 - 20:44 CET
The report of the Bank of Spain in March 2012 on the Bankia group, which it submitted to a quarterly review, clears some doubts about who knew before the cessation of Rodrigo Rato as its president in May 2012 which was the financial abyss that was such a bank and what their possibilities of survival. The Bank of Spain seemed to conclude that the chances of its parent, BFA, were nil, but added that this was not a secret to the entity. The letter leaves no doubt: "The main conclusion is that the group's parent, BFA, is not a viable entity, diagnosis is shared by the president of the organization, who says they are studying a new group structure. This commitment to restructure the group also appears in the letter from the chief financial and risk of Bankia monitoring the CEO of Bank of Spain, dated March 5. "
The plan submitted to the Bank of Spain on May 4, Rato proposed a new subsidiary-parent structure, with the transfer of the majority of assets and liabilities at the subsidiary, Bankia. This was intended, among other things, take advantage of tax credits that BFA could not use.
The report of the Bank of Spain raised the shot to managers. "With regard to corporate governance, we understand that Bankia should be managed as a firm in difficulty and so far are doing well, as evidenced by the generous early retirement policies and fixed and variable remuneration."
The slaps the management team headed by Rato did not end here: "We also appreciate the problems to generate negative accounting and management information. And the system of decision making is not transparent, so we can not say that decisions are taken after considering the various impacts on Bankia governance during 2011. "
This fifth quarterly monitoring report BFA by the Bank of Spain, the toughest in the findings, admitted that the problem as a basis for judging the situation was "The recurring problem on basic information for filing financial statements and management documentation. "
But a year earlier, in March 2011, many of these criticisms have already been reflected on the management team and technical language or sweetened in another report of the Bank of Spain: "Internal governance: lack a professional figure bearing class day by day. " "There are two immediate downsides: the continuity of the guideline and markedly political character of the members of the Board of Directors (...). Have primacy geographical distribution criteria (Madrid / Valencia) and political power over the technical and professional in the composition of the Council. "
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿