米国では、資産を膨らませて、S＆Pの格付けに複数36.8億が必要になります
EE UU exigirá más de 3.680 millones a S&P por inflar las calificaciones de activos
El Departamento de Justicia presenta la demanda contra la agencia de calificación en el tribunal federal de California por las altas notas que puso a los activos hipotecarios antes de la crisis
Los jefes de Moody's salen de la crisis que provocaron con sueldos récord
Todo el poder para los que se equivocaron
Sandro Pozzi Nueva York 5 FEB 2013 - 18:15 CET
U.S. will require more than 3680 million to S & P's ratings by inflating assets
The Department of Justice files suit against the rating agency in federal court in California by the high ratings that put the mortgage assets before the crisis
The heads of Moody's out of the crisis that led to record salaries
All power to those who were wrong
Sandro Pozzi New York 5 FEB 2013 - 18:15 CET
Rating agencies could pay the notes put faces to toxic assets before the financial crisis. For starters, Standard & Porr's could cost more than 5,000 million dollars (3,680 million euros). After months of negotiations with the Justice Department and U.S. prosecutors from several U.S. states, U.S. authorities have launched a lawsuit against the agency, owned by McGraw-Hill, by the way we got high marks to assets mortgage debt before the outbreak of the financial crisis. The government, which brought the lawsuit in federal court in California, said in a court filing that civil monetary penalties expected from his performance against S & P and McGraw Hill. The U.S. attorney general, Eric Holder, who appeared before the press, has risen to 5,000 million punishment.
"Inflating deliberately credit ratings to the CDOs (collateralized debt obligations), S & P misled investors, including many financial institutions insured by the government, causing them to lose billions of dollars," said the U.S. Attorney General .
By deliberately inflating credit ratings to the CDOs, S & P misled investors "
Eric Holder, U.S. Attorney General
S & P said last night, through a statement that it had acted "in good faith when assessing mortgage assets" that drove the financial institutions. He noted that "we learned the lesson" after the collapse of Lehman Brothers and considered, in this sense, that the Justice Department action was justified now. McGraw-Hill also recalled that already announced over a year ago a major restructuring of the conglomerate and a large investment in qualifying improvements to prevent errors as they are now questioning.
Shares of the company and Moody's, the other major sector agency, fell hard yesterday, after learning of legal action. On Tuesday, however, the collapse is more moderate: McGraw-Hill falls just over 5%. He lost 14% yesterday and rebound, dragged titles Moody's, 10%. This second signature, however, after yesterday's hangover today leaves less than 1%.
Action through civil
The action against S & P is the first federal court action against a rating agency for alleged wrongful conduct in connection with crises, which would add several state prosecutors. The legal action against S & P have occurred, according to The Wall Street Journal, after the breakdown of talks that kept the agency and the Justice Department to reach an agreement.
Head of Standard & Poor's in New York / Henny Ray Abrams (AP)
Intentions are known Washington to hold accountable when S & P for the excesses behind the credit market collapse. The research took shape, and, after the agency withdrew the highest credit rating for U.S. sovereign debt.
The legal action is done through civil and, in it, the Government requests a jury trial. In none of the cases investigated to date against the big Wall Street firms could prove criminal conduct. In consideration of the U.S. Congress on the causes of the crisis identified rating agencies as one of the perpetrators. Even so, there is still room to reach an agreement out of court if they reach an agreement outside of court.
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿