スペインのマドリッドやカタルーニャ自治政府は、個人所得税からの自治州政府の税金の取り分の増加?を要求
Madrid acerca posiciones con Cataluña para la nueva financiación
Está a favor de elevar la participación en el IRPF para mejorar los recursos
Montoro desata la pugna entre las comunidades por el reparto del déficit
Jesús Sérvulo González / María Fernández Madrid 2 ABR 2013 - 21:36 CET
Madrid about Catalonia positions for new funding
Are you in favor of raising the income tax share resources to improve
Montoro unleashes the conflict between communities over the distribution of the deficit
Sérvulo Jesus Gonzalez / María Fernández Madrid 2 ABR 2013 - 21:36 CET
All the country's finance directors take the calculator: Returns the sudoku regional funding. The only thing everyone agrees on is that the current model does not work. The battle has begun where the government less expected: between communities governed by the PP. Madrid has opened the first breach diverging from other communities politically related but very different in weight and population, such Castilla y León and Aragón. The counselor Madrid, Enrique Ossorio, dropped yesterday in a meeting with reporters that one of the lines of the new model could be further transfer taxes, specifically income tax, which a priori would hurt poor and depopulated territories. "The percentages grow assignment is no more funding for this increased funding would have to return it to the state via the sufficiency fund," the counselor Madrid. In fact, Madrid is only 17% of what it collects this tax, according to government sources Madrid.
However, Madrid launched Executive winks Artur Mas. "What is good for Madrid is good for Catalonia", even said Ossorio, which included a Decalogue on the principles that should be the new model of its old claims: "A clear and updated system of VAT and delivery Excise ". The Minister complained that Madrid is only 17% VAT when the weight of the economy verges on 20%.
Ossorio: "What is good for Madrid is good for Catalonia"
The internal anger autonomy is served and each has begun to play his cards. All aspire to more buts these limited resources. If a winner is because others are disrupted. In the afternoon the Minister of Finance of Castile and Leon, Pilar del Olmo, who has opposed the asymmetry which aims Catalonia with the deficit ceiling, asked the opposition (PSOE and mixed group) in Parliament castellanoleonesas a pact to fight "together" for a new funding model to improve the current, anticipating that the battle will be complicated. "Possibly the new model took longer than a year despite what they want other communities," he said after criticizing the current system as "insufficient, with little solidarity and high complexity. The resources we will receive this year fall short of what we perceived in 2006 ".
Most territories are against Catalonia check the script of the new cast waving the flag of independence, as it did five years ago with the Statute of Autonomy. But as he has done with the deficit limit, the Minister Cristobal Montoro open season to begin designing the new funding model in the last Fiscal Policy Council (FFPC), held two weeks ago.
Castile and Leon asked the PSOE pact to tackle the negotiation
The Decalogue Madrid advanced yesterday counselor for the next model "is compatible", in his words, with the aspirations of the Catalan. That will require that the government inject more money into the system autonomy. Although Finance Minister hinted that there will be more resources for the cast, Madrid believes that the government will have to loosen. "Eventually all governments end up paying more money. Has it ever occurred. "
Ossorio believes that negotiations should be "multilateral", so that the new system is agreed by all autonomy. "The previous one was bilateral, designed between the central executive and Catalonia" he said. Madrid hopes that the next model to be "transparent". "We must eliminate statistical twisting", claimed the counselor, who complain that the system does not take into account the entire population for the distribution of transfers.
The idea that the allocation should be based on fair criteria is repeated like a mantra in other communities. But everyone has their own idea of what criteria are fair or unfair. "We will not allow it to negotiate under the table", government sources say canary (CC). They call a system "transparent criteria and plain" without bilateral agreements negotiated by and for all, and even though they know that they will not receive more resources, claiming a model that does not harm: "There can be a difference [funding] 1,000 euros per capita with the average as now, otherwise create a country of different speeds ".
"In the end, all governments end up putting more money," says the counselor Madrid
In Andalusia (PSOE-IU) ensure that each year lose 1,000 million current funding. "We will not comment without a proposal on the table", point out at the idea of counseling thrown from Madrid. Nor Galicia manifested while being one of the communities that would lose if they relegate variables such as dispersal and population aging. In La Rioja, its president Pedro Sanz (PP), states that funding should be based on an agreement "unanimous as it had with the Aznar government."
Montoro proposed compensation for weeks for regions with more severe deficits. "Revenues should be lower for not meeting", he said, something that demanded autonomy that made more cuts. The Decalogue Madrid includes points that limit the claims Catalonia. So, Madrid aspires to achieve one common funding model for all communities and no more exceptions like Catalonia claims for himself.
The "model Margallo"
Jose Manuel Garcia Margallo, foreign minister who for years struggled with economic issues as a deputy in the European Parliament, has more tracks than Montoro on how should be the next model of regional financing. In an interview with the newspaper El Mundo on Sunday, Margallo said the government "should be reserved for major taxes affecting the internal market, VAT and corporation tax", and leave the rest "to the individual autonomy" as the income tax.
The new model should prioritize, according to the minister, "essential services", and they are not raised when funding. "The fiscal responsibility is not so much as leaving water transfer autonomy to operate their own wells," he reflected, and opted to implement public prices. "Here we have become obsessed to discuss the health copayment, but the British Labour debate on motorways rates depending on what cars pollute. What advantage does this system? It achieves a similar result to the concerts of the regional territories. "
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿