スペイン大統領のマリアノ=ラホイとカタルーニャ州政府大統領のマスとの間に合意はあったのか?
¿Pero hubo acuerdo Mas-Rajoy?
Por: José María Izquierdo
.
(Madrid, 1946) fue redactor
jefe de Diario 16, subdirector de Informaciones y
corresponsal de EFE en La Habana. En 1983
se incorpora a EL PAÍS como jefe de Edición,
donde fue redactor jefe y subdirector. En 1989
se incorpora como director de los Servicios
Informativos a Canal+. En 1995 vuelve a
El País como director adjunto.
Desde setiembre de 2005 hasta
noviembre de 2009 fue director
de los Informativos Cuatro y de CNN+.
But there was agreement Mas-Rajoy?
By: José María Izquierdo.(Madrid, 1946) was editor
Chief of Diario 16, deputy director of Information and
Reuters correspondent in Havana. 1983
COUNTRY joins as Head of Editing,where he was editor in chief and deputy. In 1989
joins as Director of Services
News to Canal +. 1995 againThe Country as deputy director.From September 2005 to
November 2009 was director
Four of News and CNN +.
We continue with Mas and Rajoy. Now it is, so we have our guys, that Mas bites Rajoy's outstretched hand. I do not know. And we know nothing because the Prime Minister has a bad habit of not being accountable to anyone-citizens, the first people you should meet, what is the official residence with other political leaders. So it seems fair to question things that were in that interview clandestine-secret not-as we have been transmitted from governmental environments. Because, what if that day there was no agreement?
And today El Mundo and La Gaceta out in a rush to defend Nunez Feijoo. They have the right, but not distort reality. The president of the Xunta, then second in the Ministry of Health, knew who was Marcial Dorado when they became the famous photos. And knew well, as any newspaper reader, and if you lived in Galicia, its involvement in major transactions relating to smuggling and his travels to the courts. That, and no other, is the reality.
Franco Do you remember? I have..
Abc editorials accustomed point to their targets. The first, for ERE: "Suspicious silence association". Summary: "The leaders of the UGT and CCOO must give explanations and to your ways in ERE scandal because everything points to its direct participation in a gigantic fraud with money from the unemployed ". I very much like to give all the possible explanations for the ERE and especially what it takes. Would be good. What happens is that it is not acceptable to the asserted basis rather ridiculous, and compel the accused to defend themselves from the snares. And with that, to appear one at a time or both together union leaders and explain in great detail his involvement in the famous ERE. Although you already know that will not help, because once created the mountain, you have to hold it in place. And unions, as is more than evident, they have freaked. The Government and the Brunete Armored will not finish this term-and I refer to the time of death-without hurting the trade unions. Or at least try. Eager.
And the second, Artur Mas: "Catalonia is governed by a" bipartisan facto 'that, as anticipated ABC spokesman confirmed yesterday Homs, continues unchanged in its defiance of the Constitution and intends to reach independence. The recent statements confirm each other without nuances revved nationalists as to the law of consultation and the creation of the so-called 'national transition'. Thus, the agenda meets apace stages and anticipation remains that the referendum be held throughout 2014. So, pecan-naive-at least those who interpret Artur Mas visit the Moncloa and the opening of negotiations on key funding waiver sovereignty project. " Do we know, perhaps, how it developed that meeting? What if they lied La Moncloa environment when they left that Mas had given betray all?
Luckily we always have our head philosopher, Gabriel Albiac, which comes to enlighten us on this path we black towards the end we do not know. To be warming. Needed: "Reading, a bit random, Aristotle's Poetics mostly because other shelter should be safe from this wind sterile-, bullet unexpectedly with this concise compendium of melancholy: 'old did speak to their characters in political tone, the now, in rhetorical language '. Is it about the classics: time stops in these flashes. Nothing can alter its truth a point. Eternity is that. " Because everything is clear: "To what Aristotle called rhetoric, there is too much trouble to find out. Just open the first page his book by that title: 'rhetoric is the antistrophe of dialectic'. Which applies the knowledge antagonist. Scan it, it persuades. And, to persuade, necessarily lie: imposes belief. " Should not we surrender to the strength, the courage, the bravery of the writer?
I do not soured on the day, but the minister Montoro-that of the lies, yes, he has said that we are emerging from the crisis and that we are about to be rich and live happily. Fear gives us. Is that yesterday was in the Reason and tell us in the editorial several highly credible revelations. Especially coming from whom they come. And the tone ... ah, the tone used by the minister liked us. Read the first paragraph of the editorial. It will appeal: "We must be very clear and very firm data certainties to infuse optimism in the midst of profound crisis citizen. But yes Cristobal Montoro has them and there is nothing impost or truculence in his positive diagnosis, which is summarized in this sentence that forum yesterday Reason: 2013 is the last year of economic crisis in Spain ". No need to follow ...
The editorial in The World is defined with the title: "Feijoo, victim of a manipulation that is not supported". Bello start: "The hindsight bias is a cognitive bias is the tendency to reinterpret what happened in the past in terms of the information that is provided in the present." Nice, but false in this case. He knows the editorialist, even professorial tone to take the matter in the frontispiece, and commentators know already set up house, armed with hoses to muddy the field, as always willing Santiago Gonzalez. How will the defense bizarre Pierre Joseph, that to justify the unjustifiable reach nonsense like this: "Just could publish pictures of Rubalcaba with Felipe González Roldán or Rafael Vera". Do any of dozens that have already been published? What reasoning, to deserve such a definition is that? So is this defense forced Galician leader have to write paragraphs like this: "You can criticize Nunez Feijoo by the bad taste to choose their companies two decades ago, but nothing more."
Nothing more, you say? We will limit ourselves to pick up what they themselves in the editorial to know what was the exact location where the photos were made: "These pictures are from 18 years ago and the guy next to Nunez Feijoo is Marcial Dorado. The current president of the Xunta de Galicia was number two in the Ministry of Health of the community and Dorado had been arrested for smuggling snuff but had not been sentenced. Garzón also stopped by a repentant Portabales accusations that involved in drug trafficking, but had to release him unable to establish its foundation. " Does this mean, as they themselves acknowledge, that the then senior official of the regional government knew, as all Galicians who simply read the newspapers in the area, who was such Dorado, and yet enjoyed yachts and leisure travel a regular visitor to the courts accused of trafficking varied for several years and had been involved up to their eyeballs in major operations carried out in Galicia against smuggling. Do you think a little? Thing in bad taste? No, no, something else. Or unconsciousness or sleeve too wide for criminals. In any case, very bad for a politician. Because Marcial Dorado was not a businessman to use, as Jacinto Rey, Quintana Anxo host, or Jorge Dorribo then, the car of Joseph White. As it was in the public domain for 18 years, as much as you take philosophy World sixpenny this ugly business and talk of "hindsight bias." False.
He said the unions. Here is a small sample of the cares of our friends against unions. Ramón Pi, in the Gazette: "We saw it coming from the beginning of the transition that unions called 'class', were silly times pilgrimage to Cuba and Moscow leftist-only aspired to succeed the Franco Union Organization, and nothing more (...) The result is a huge crib quasi union officials who ends up caring a fig have affiliates or not having them: they are already in the machinery of money and power. "
FAÇADE
Reason was invited yesterday at his home Cristobal Montoro. As before, pages and pages: 16, only 16. The nicest, concrete face of the Minister of Finance: "Spain is a serious country and does makeup the deficit." But man, if you just tell Brussels that were not swallowed their controls of 6.7%! In Abc are very angry: "CiU and ERC bite Rajoy's outstretched hand." Summary: "Junqueras says the approach is 'a big lie' and that the only priority is the query". Another headline, erre que erre: "Toxo confirmed that the ERE society devoid of profit". I repeat: So? The World: "The luxury ski uncovered his loot Swiss Barcenas". Summary: "Your request for a credit card limit of € 25,000 for the trip alerted the authorities and the police." Has your point, but the story seems more peliculera than real, really. Years had Barcenas with a lifestyle impossible for everyone-and especially the dome of the PP who shared the same floor as offices, knew it was crazy. But anyway, if you like the plots of detective movies ... It also carries an interview with the judge who jailed drug dealer friend of President Galician: "The investigation found no evidence of anything against Feijoo". Just missing, carallo!, They would say in those lands. We also have this beautiful mask: "The City coasted 203 golf lessons for Aznar and their families." Is not that nice? The Gazette joins World Feijoo to defend: "For the lips sink ships," referring to Anxo Quintana, who do not know what he did Quintana, but Feijoo was a friend, friend, Dorado. They put on like put.
Famed LEFT EYE MUSEUM(Documents and testimonies of life in caves)
A commemorative date.
Title: "Who lost the April 1, 1939?"
Text: "This April 1st is the 74th anniversary of the victory of the Popular Front national. Although the topic, something silly like most of them, says that history is written by the victors, not always the case, much less, and in the case of the Spanish Civil War have been written mostly up (...) The April 1st victory was, in short, on a coalition of rivals of Stalin, revolutionary Marxists, anarchists gunmen, racist PNV, diverse and separatist coup ".
Pío Moa. The Gazette, April 1, 2013.
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿