http://elpais.com
Opinion
今回の世界経済主要国会議でも、世論は、この長い経済不況を克服するために, 政治家の意思の無さや、実行的解決案の不在には、もう開き飽きだ、IMFは、スペインのサパテロ(Rodriguez Zapatero)元大統領の付加価値税や特別税の値上げ、公務員の給料の削減、住宅購買控除の廃止を評価
No más declaraciones de principios
El FMI avala la antigua política de Rodríguez Zapatero y desautoriza la de Mariano Rajoy
No more statements of principle
The IMF supports the longstanding policy of Zapatero and Mariano Rajoy disallowing
Joaquin Stephanie 18 JUN 2012 - 00:09 CET
The IMF supports the longstanding policy of Zapatero and Mariano Rajoy disallowing
Joaquin Stephanie 18 JUN 2012 - 00:09 CET
It will be unbearable if the next summit of heads (G-20, Rio +20, Eurogroup, Ecofin, Rome, European Council, ...) only come, as so often has been in recent times, announced and solemn rhetoric, empty of political and technical solutions. Public opinion will not bear again so much deception, so much impotence of their leaders. No more output than concrete and explicit timetable to overcome this economic nightmare, so long and deep.
It is true that the state of public anxiety is not the same everywhere. Unlike in past years there is no global economic crisis: the average growth rate in 2012 close to 4%. There are three fully differentiated situations: the emerging countries, which continue to grow much despite a slowdown in recent weeks (China, which is the main buyer of many countries are reducing their imports), the U.S., which has a slow growth (not based on the construction) and that of Europe, amid a crisis of monumental growth. This planetary model at different speeds should emphasize something: for the first time in the last 200 years decreases inequality between countries (emerging because the rich are going well and not so much), but does not yield inequality within nations, especially the huge incomes of the wealthiest. Bebchuck Professor, Faculty of Law, Harvard University, argues that at this time has abolished the main limitation on the salary of some managers, the "restriction scandal" and that the rapid increase in income wealthy minority reflects the same social and political factors that encouraged the lax financial regulation.
In most of the next summit, the immediate future of Europe heads. This is the first contemporary crisis in which there are genuine opponents of the euro, and these are primarily located in the City of London and Wall Street head offices of the Financial Times and the Wall Street Journal, media that have meaning for their hypercritical to European problems, and true bible of international investors. In the immediate future will play an important role three issues: the possibility of replacing the austerity plans by others closer to growth, in line with the ideas that came out of the first meetings of the G-20, a medium-term plan progress towards institutional banking unit, fiscal and political, after so long break and contradictions, and a less cumbersome decision methods that do not pose a permanent disadvantage to Europe face greater procedural flexibility in the U.S. and, especially, China and other emerging countries.
The IMF supports the longstanding policy of Zapatero and Mariano Rajoy disallowing
The European package is Spain, whose economic policy has just suffered an amendment almost entirely in the IMF's annual report. This calls into question the whole of the State Budget (will not be met, by far, the government deficit ceilings are the top priority of the Government) and demand immediate measures as the rise in Value Added Tax (VAT ) and excise duties, reduction of salary of staff and the elimination of the deduction for home purchase. The three decisions were taken by the last government abolished Zapatero and Rajoy by the Executive. President of Government has stated that the IMF's recommendations not be implemented immediately, so that, in view of what happened in recent months (speech in a sense, in practice the opposite), and may be preparing consumers homebuyers and officials.
Rajoy has boasted of his independence from the IMF. We all know that it is not. Spain is the Florida of Europe, but the Florida legislature does not have to worry about collecting the funds to meet its obligations because ultimately it is behind the U.S. Federal Government. Spain, however, is alone in a Union of 27 countries. As noted in its glorious head of Time magazine, "You say tomato and I say rescue."
It is true that the state of public anxiety is not the same everywhere. Unlike in past years there is no global economic crisis: the average growth rate in 2012 close to 4%. There are three fully differentiated situations: the emerging countries, which continue to grow much despite a slowdown in recent weeks (China, which is the main buyer of many countries are reducing their imports), the U.S., which has a slow growth (not based on the construction) and that of Europe, amid a crisis of monumental growth. This planetary model at different speeds should emphasize something: for the first time in the last 200 years decreases inequality between countries (emerging because the rich are going well and not so much), but does not yield inequality within nations, especially the huge incomes of the wealthiest. Bebchuck Professor, Faculty of Law, Harvard University, argues that at this time has abolished the main limitation on the salary of some managers, the "restriction scandal" and that the rapid increase in income wealthy minority reflects the same social and political factors that encouraged the lax financial regulation.
In most of the next summit, the immediate future of Europe heads. This is the first contemporary crisis in which there are genuine opponents of the euro, and these are primarily located in the City of London and Wall Street head offices of the Financial Times and the Wall Street Journal, media that have meaning for their hypercritical to European problems, and true bible of international investors. In the immediate future will play an important role three issues: the possibility of replacing the austerity plans by others closer to growth, in line with the ideas that came out of the first meetings of the G-20, a medium-term plan progress towards institutional banking unit, fiscal and political, after so long break and contradictions, and a less cumbersome decision methods that do not pose a permanent disadvantage to Europe face greater procedural flexibility in the U.S. and, especially, China and other emerging countries.
The IMF supports the longstanding policy of Zapatero and Mariano Rajoy disallowing
The European package is Spain, whose economic policy has just suffered an amendment almost entirely in the IMF's annual report. This calls into question the whole of the State Budget (will not be met, by far, the government deficit ceilings are the top priority of the Government) and demand immediate measures as the rise in Value Added Tax (VAT ) and excise duties, reduction of salary of staff and the elimination of the deduction for home purchase. The three decisions were taken by the last government abolished Zapatero and Rajoy by the Executive. President of Government has stated that the IMF's recommendations not be implemented immediately, so that, in view of what happened in recent months (speech in a sense, in practice the opposite), and may be preparing consumers homebuyers and officials.
Rajoy has boasted of his independence from the IMF. We all know that it is not. Spain is the Florida of Europe, but the Florida legislature does not have to worry about collecting the funds to meet its obligations because ultimately it is behind the U.S. Federal Government. Spain, however, is alone in a Union of 27 countries. As noted in its glorious head of Time magazine, "You say tomato and I say rescue."
今回の世界経済主要国会議でも、世論は、この長い経済不況を克服するために政治家の意思の無さや、実行的解決案の不在には、もう開き飽きだ、IMFは、スペインのサパテロ(Rodriguez Zapatero)元大統領の付加価値税や特別税の値上げ、公務員の給料の削減、住宅購買控除の廃止を評価
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿